Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
If we consider the conceptual meaning, they are basically equal. If we consider the ontological basis, then kek is secondary to lol. If it wasn't for lol, then kek wouldn't have appeared. Or it would have appeared with a completely different meaning. From an epistemological point of view, the awareness of lol as a keka depends on whether you are for the horde or for the alliance. At the same time, kek will not be perceived as lol under any circumstances, as this contradicts its essence, which is proof of its secondary nature. Therefore, many people believe that it is better to nedolit than perekekat.