Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
First of all, the question should not be simply Googled. You should not ask what sepulchres are if there is a large article on this topic on Wikipedia.
Second, the question should not be based on questionable presuppositions. You should also not ask why all Christians are crazy, because not everyone thinks they are crazy.
Third, the question should not be formulated in such a way that it cannot be answered in an obvious way. Is it true that all scientists are in a conspiracy to deceive the public? How can you answer this question? The point is not even that there is obviously no such conspiracy, but that he does not and cannot have such evidence that you could have predicted. If there were real evidence of a conspiracy, it would be known to everyone and the conspiracy would not exist, and the evidence itself would be easily Googled, see point 1.
The wording should clearly, clearly and unambiguously express the essence of the issue. Yes, this is difficult to do. I often ask finding questions or ask for clarification.