Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
In fact, every year there are fewer and fewer haters of contemporary art.
There are several reasons why hatred in principle can be:
1. It's not clear. Modern art is quite complex, it is built on symbols, hints and images. But it is simply not clear to many.
2. It does not continue the previous directions of art. Modern trends in art are aimed at deconstructing the existing foundations. Therefore, a large number of conservatives do not particularly perceive modern works as art, considering them empty. But, of course, this is not the case.
3. Contemporary art exposes the problems of modern society. Gender, political, social, existential and many other issues and problems are addressed by contemporary creators. And it's annoying. Moreover, most of all “infuriates” those who agree with current trends, stereotypes and other foundations.
Hatred of an art object often arises from fear and misunderstanding, a sense of deception.
The viewer does not understand what is in front of him-an imbalance, no value, deception.
The artist made a poor-quality work – it has no history, meaning and context.
The artist himself cannot create in the past – he lives here and now. Therefore, everything that is produced in our time can be called modern art.
If the viewer doesn't understand the context, then you need to create a value for the item. This is the work of both the artist and the viewer at the same time.
The viewer will have to engage in self-education, watch, read, and understand the meaning. If this is not done, then any new form will be perceived with difficulty. You can't love what you don't know, what you don't react to. A sense of harmony can be nurtured by studying.
The artist should be offered a dialogue with their work. Since modern means of creativity will never be the same, academic forms. Even if you work in academic painting, you will have to promote your format in a diverse modern and digital environment. This will be a new form of contemporary art.
Rumors of hatred for contemporary art are somewhat exaggerated.
Analysis of the global trend shows that contemporary art-architecture, painting, sculpture, videography, multimedia, photography, and actionism-attract a lot of attention. The main mechanism of business in creativity is built on them. We cannot say that everything that is created is perceived with hatred. Often this is due to surprise, curiosity and misunderstanding. And this encourages interest.
It is impossible to hate art, it exists and will not disappear anywhere. You can choose what is close to you.
Because to understand it, it usually requires a little more than just identifying the picture and evaluating the author's skill. It is very easy to perceive landscapes and still lifes: here are meadows, here are pears, everything is beautiful and neat. But some artists do not use “pears” in their works, but, for example, blots. And the less talented ones will simply draw a blot, and someone will tell the whole story with the help of a blot, which is difficult to understand by looking at the picture. I understand that not everything that is called contemporary art can be perceived adequately, because it sometimes looks too provocative, but this is how art works. Take, for example, the famous ” Black Square” Malevich, who for his time was also a contemporary artist. It is still difficult to understand it, but to do this, you need to get acquainted in principle with the Supremacist movement, learn from their manifestos what they wanted to say with their works and what they were striving for. And believe me, there can be more art in these works than in the most beautiful portraits. It is sometimes much easier to depict reality than to tell a whole story in a few strokes. By the way, we have an article where we try to figure out how to distinguish art from what is not related to it.
Is this possible!? The right word.
Who hates watching beauty?
Where work, talent, uniqueness, will,
Give a value to the canvas.
Where is the MYSTERY, not the rebus,
Undead hearing and eyes.
Where the feelings of tension, not the mind!
Art is where there is no place for shame.
Which is too much for every piece of shit.
What is modern art and how does it differ from non-modern art? Does seeing beauty depend on time? “To see the wonderful in the wonderful is the key to all the mysteries of the world.” And how can you hate art? I think this is not possible. With respect.
People have a natural craving for beauty And they see the beauty of nature firsthand or in successful photos Men look at beautiful women There are even beauty contests among women And everyone is happy to appreciate the grace of lines and proportions of figures And suddenly they say Yes what do you admire ? You don't know anything about beauty, do you? Here it is ! And then they are handed a canvas smeared with paint Shock! It turns out that I have something wrong with my head since childhood , the viewer is afraid and just in case begins to agree
If modern art is a branch tied to the plywood that hangs in the Hermitage,then it's no wonder why people don't like modern art. Or performances about homosexuals in the center of Moscow..Is this also contemporary art?
Because it's not art. Today, it is easier to invent a “new” direction than to learn how to draw. This is just a business, the benefit of rich idiots is enough to “suck” them “bullshit”.
It is impossible to hate art, because it contains all the best that it has: wisdom, harmony and beauty. But, we are often imposed kitsch, trying to prove that this is a super art, to which we allegedly did not grow up. What for? Is it unclear to anyone? Then develop your mind. As long as there are fools in the world, they can live by deception, so they can live by hand.
they hate not art, but all sorts of profanation, such as a branch tied up with cattle . And art is something that, even if it is not clear, but attractive, that you want to understand
Art should evoke an emotional response. If you hate a work of art , then it has achieved its goal – it has caused an emotion, a feeling.
For art, the problem is not when it is hated, but when it is indifferent, as they say, “does not cling” IMHO.
He was different… Here is a short answer…. Although a lot of things are left from the past… But people progressively forget this by spreading new ideas…. This offends the adherents of the immutable “standard” very much…;) although these are just my thoughts… So that's just a probability.
Because most of the works are something like the Malevich Square. There is no difficulty in it, you can choose different colors of paint and “draw” on paper. But the Malevich Square is valuable because it was written by a professional…
But the fact is that art is mainly interested in people after 40. But for them, there is no modern art. I'm a writer by profession, and I'm also interested in cultural issues. And every day I am surprised to see that the level is falling ( not to mention the government, there is no such thing at all, it seems that we are ruled by troglodytes). And the dominance of svintosov in the media? This is a nightmare! WHERE is our once-hated censorship?And this is an objective process. We will wait for the renaissance… 200 years from now
Yes, indeed, many people do not like modern art. Even such iconic figures as Andron Konchalovsky, a man who is not stupid and involved in art not in words. Well, they “don't understand” it. And you don't need to understand it, but you need to feel it, just like any work of art. You need to understand the Newtonian binomial, and here you need sensitive resonance and heart contact. Once I went into the Maly Manege in St. George's, and there on the wall is an original of Jackson Pollock. I was nailed to the floor by the energy power of this canvas. And our”amazons of the Russian avant-garde”? What is there to understand? There is a purgatory of exorbitant power. And now compare all this with the genre of Peredvizhniki or even earlier “exposures of the vices of Russian life”? That's what I never understood. Where is the art here? However, even now there are many fans of realism, who need to hit the shafts on the head to make them cry or laugh. I don't want that, thank you.
Hello, everything is simple, the entry threshold is too high to understand modern art, you need a decent amount of knowledge about the subject and an understanding of the context, which an ordinary hater usually does not have)
In my opinion, the question is completely incorrect. What does “contemporary art” mean? If by this term we mean everything that is being created at the present time or was created in the recent past, then there is a lot of different things in it. If the definition of “modern art” includes newfangled performances. installations, etc., they, in my opinion, can cause anything, but not hatred.
Under the “modern art” often hides mediocre and meaningless daub, and even just stupid and disgusting hooligan antics. Moreover, self-styled “geniuses” demand impunity for their piggy behavior.
They hate it because people don't like being taken for idiots. To sell people black squares and blots for a work of art is to consider people an idiot.
Most people are able to understand that a banana taped to the wall is not art, but a mockery of people. And when moronic artists with smart faces, smiling sourly, rant about the elitism of this bullshit and that it is understandable only to supposedly exceptional people, then naturally it causes hatred among normal people.
Because bullshit is just bullshit, whatever you want to call it
I wouldn't say “hate”. Hatred can be felt for something serious, weighty and significant. Modern “art”, or rather , the so-called “art”, is difficult to hate. It can only be despised, feeling a sense of disgust, like lice or helminths. Because its function is the same-to parasitize. But they hate its authors, who go out of their way to profanate, trying to pass off a bunch of shit as a masterpiece and explaining to us, the UNENLIGHTENED CROWD, that we simply did not grow up to the great works of Pavlensky, nailed to the pavement, “Black Square”, green rectangle, broken toilet bowl and other nasty things. They hate these “creators” for their lack of conscience and honor, for their lack of talent, for their ability to humiliate themselves in any way they want for money, for their venality, for their constant deception, for their filth, for the harm they cause to real art and the consciousness of people, especially young people.
I also deny it. the reason is that it is absolutely meaningless,without any idea,it does not even try to make a person spiritually richer. it is not humane, but rather anti-human. he breathes not life and joy,but death and hatred of everything
In part, modern art is “infuriating”,as the author of the comment noted)”Infuriates”with its craftiness.For example, in creating an abstraction with the help of mint and a hole in a bucket of paint, it is difficult to find artistic, but at least some idea and emotional experiences of the author.But if such a craftsman has friends of a well-defined circle,then such a work can cost a lot of money and will be an example of modern art.The funny thing is that most people understand that such a work is a technical craft at the kindergarten level.But, with a smart look, they are looking for supermatism and meaning where it does not and cannot be.
A vivid example of the entry of the” mimish ” Pokemon generation into a responsible age can be a photo of two penguins that has collected an incredible number of positive responses and reviews.
Thus, the artistic value of the work was evaluated by what the author wrote in the accompanying note…
The prestigious prize for contribution to the development of science fiction as a literary genre (!) was awarded to the LGBT MLF talanti, which has enriched humanity with six novels in 20 years.Karl! With wool! This award was given to Asimov if anything.But because of the current fashion trend, the Asimovs would not have received the award if they were not black and LGBT.
Here are some specific examples of why modern art can be “infuriating”.
In part, modern art is “infuriating”,as the author of the comment noted)”Infuriates”with its craftiness.For example, in creating an abstraction with the help of mint and a hole in a bucket of paint, it is difficult to find artistic, but at least some idea and emotional experiences of the author.But if such a craftsman has friends of a well-defined circle,then such a work can cost a lot of money and will be an example of modern art.The funny thing is that most people understand that such a work is a technical craft at the kindergarten level.But, with a smart look, they are looking for supermatism and meaning where it does not and cannot be.
A vivid example of the entry of the” mimish ” Pokemon generation into a responsible age can be a photo of two penguins that has collected an incredible number of positive responses and reviews.
Thus, the artistic value of the work was evaluated by what the author wrote in the accompanying note…
The prestigious prize for contribution to the development of science fiction as a literary genre (!) was awarded to the LGBT MLF talanti, which has enriched humanity with six novels in 20 years.Karl! With wool! This award was given to Asimov if anything…But because of the current fashion trend, the Asimovs would not have received the award if they were not black and LGBT.
Here are some specific examples of why modern art can be “infuriating”.
We don't notice the hatred of contemporary art) It should be understood that modern art is not only shocking paintings or installations. We call modern art created by artists who are our contemporaries, who live with us in the same city, country, or planet) Here and now. And now different artists write in different styles (from academic realism to conceptual and avant-garde art) – and this is also modern art!
The fact that someone does not like “incomprehensible” art is a question of viewing enough in the first place. Well, in the second – you don't have to like everything in a row. That would be weird.
Visit our website and see various paintings by contemporary artists: http://www.gallerysmart.ru