If there were a good god, he would save me the trouble of watching thousands of people who are too lazy to find out for themselves what is proven to be present and not absent, and who have decided that their ignorance is an excellent argument against atheism. But as I observe you, God is either not good or does not exist.
Do you have a new Lamborghini? if not, how can you prove its absence? The phrase “Well, I know that I don't have it” is not appropriate, otherwise I can also say that I just know that there is no God. Absence as such is virtually unprovable, and it doesn't make sense
And what is the evidence for the absence of fairies? The fact is that you can invent an infinite number of things that are impossible to prove in principle, especially if you say in advance that they are outside of space and time. Therefore, the approver must prove the validity of his statement. However, after thousands of years of hard intellectual work by the smartest people on the planet, theists have not invented convincing evidence, which in itself says a lot.
You can see for yourself what the answer to your question should be if you try to answer mine…
I know, and I say so, that there is an elephant in your apartment. As intangible as the angels and the rest of the population of the world in which the God of believers lives. I've made it easier for you: you don't have to look for a place where this elephant isn't there. You only need to prove that it is not specifically in your apartment. Prove it!
First, believers need to give a definition of God, what he is and what properties he has (verbal portrait) in order to identify him. Then indicate the permanent residence of God. It is clear that there is no God in Hell and cannot be. That leaves Paradise.
I don't want to be unfounded and go into theory. Theory without practice is dead. I suggest that any believer take me to the Garden of Eden and walk with me there, so that I can show that God is not there.: -)
I do not know of any such evidence. But I don't know any proof of its existence. As a result, the probability of the correctness of this – one of many – hypotheses, which is also not very confirmed in everyday life and in the scientific data known to me, seems to me very low. So I can't believe it.
There is a sacred rule – knowledge does not need believers.
This is the only way to end all the verbal fornication between theists and atheists. Okay, God exists, so why believe in him?
Faith requires assumptions, assumptions, and hypotheses. But who would want to prove the obvious? Therefore, all faith exists on the background of doubt.
A person lives in a tiny world, and his restless mind tries to find answers to everything, to give its interpretation to everything. But all of this will remain speculation anyway, and nothing more.
The negative is not proved. The facts that take place are proved.
Yes, there don't seem to be any. We can assume that he has unlimited powers and uses them to hide his existence from us. Well, after that, no evidence will matter. It will simply exist regardless of what we think it does. Here you are, comrade, sitting on interesting sites, doing interesting things, and he looks at you from under his brows and thinks which cauldron is better for you to assign in the afterlife – with molten lead or boiling oil. And there's no way you can prove that he's not looking at you))
In general, smart people have long come up with the idea that if the existence of something cannot be fundamentally refuted and proved, then it is better just not to think about it and do something more useful.
The church god and the Bible God are two different things. The church god does not exist, but the Biblical god does, and he is quite material. He sends down fire from the heavens, shakes the earth, throws hail, and punishes those who worship the molten calf.
And for the fifth and last time, he goes to fulfill his prophecies.
Many believers behave as if it is not the duty of dogmatists to prove generally accepted postulates, but rather that of skeptics to refute them. This is certainly not the case. If I were to say that a porcelain teapot orbits the Sun in an elliptical orbit between the Earth and Mars, no one would be able to refute my claim if I added that the teapot is too small to be detected even by the most powerful telescopes. But if I were to say further that since my statement cannot be refuted, a reasonable person has no right to doubt its truth, then I would rightly be told that I am talking nonsense. However, if the existence of such a teapot was confirmed in ancient books, its authenticity was repeated every Sunday, and the idea was drummed into the heads of schoolchildren from childhood, then disbelief in its existence would seem strange, and the doubter would be worthy of the attention of a psychiatrist in the enlightened era, and earlier — the attention of an inquisitor.
They don't exist and never did … No one in the entire existence of mankind has ever been able to prove even with a half hint or some other evidence that God does not exist. And this is not a paradox of being It is simply not possible to deny the obvious … I can say that America doesn't exist because I've never been there but I can't say it 100% because there were hundreds of millions of people who were not just in America but also live there … It is the same with God… There are millions of people who have seen it and hundreds of millions who live with it … How can this be denied ???
And why prove the absence? Evidence should be sought by someone who claims the presence of something, not the absence. For example, I can say that somewhere in space there is a cat, but it is simply impossible to detect it with any devices. It's the same here.
Why prove it? There is everything that is described in legends, writings, literature, films, sculptures, paintings, etc. And Cheburashka, and Jehovah, and Sauron, and Santa Claus, and Yahweh, and Kolobok and Winnie the Pooh and everything, everything, everything…
Who is God? About God, who is credited with free will, the ability to create out of nothing, to break causal relationships and substantial immateriality-the proof is one: all of the above is impossible, because it is absurd. If you understand something different by God, please describe it
If there were a good god, he would save me the trouble of watching thousands of people who are too lazy to find out for themselves what is proven to be present and not absent, and who have decided that their ignorance is an excellent argument against atheism. But as I observe you, God is either not good or does not exist.
Do you have a new Lamborghini? if not, how can you prove its absence? The phrase “Well, I know that I don't have it” is not appropriate, otherwise I can also say that I just know that there is no God. Absence as such is virtually unprovable, and it doesn't make sense
And what is the evidence for the absence of fairies? The fact is that you can invent an infinite number of things that are impossible to prove in principle, especially if you say in advance that they are outside of space and time. Therefore, the approver must prove the validity of his statement. However, after thousands of years of hard intellectual work by the smartest people on the planet, theists have not invented convincing evidence, which in itself says a lot.
Absences where? In what place?
You can see for yourself what the answer to your question should be if you try to answer mine…
I know, and I say so, that there is an elephant in your apartment. As intangible as the angels and the rest of the population of the world in which the God of believers lives. I've made it easier for you: you don't have to look for a place where this elephant isn't there. You only need to prove that it is not specifically in your apartment. Prove it!
First, believers need to give a definition of God, what he is and what properties he has (verbal portrait) in order to identify him. Then indicate the permanent residence of God. It is clear that there is no God in Hell and cannot be. That leaves Paradise.
I don't want to be unfounded and go into theory. Theory without practice is dead. I suggest that any believer take me to the Garden of Eden and walk with me there, so that I can show that God is not there.: -)
I do not know of any such evidence. But I don't know any proof of its existence. As a result, the probability of the correctness of this – one of many – hypotheses, which is also not very confirmed in everyday life and in the scientific data known to me, seems to me very low. So I can't believe it.
There is a sacred rule – knowledge does not need believers.
This is the only way to end all the verbal fornication between theists and atheists. Okay, God exists, so why believe in him?
Faith requires assumptions, assumptions, and hypotheses. But who would want to prove the obvious? Therefore, all faith exists on the background of doubt.
A person lives in a tiny world, and his restless mind tries to find answers to everything, to give its interpretation to everything. But all of this will remain speculation anyway, and nothing more.
The negative is not proved. The facts that take place are proved.
There is no object, so there is nothing to prove.
Yes, there don't seem to be any. We can assume that he has unlimited powers and uses them to hide his existence from us. Well, after that, no evidence will matter. It will simply exist regardless of what we think it does. Here you are, comrade, sitting on interesting sites, doing interesting things, and he looks at you from under his brows and thinks which cauldron is better for you to assign in the afterlife – with molten lead or boiling oil. And there's no way you can prove that he's not looking at you))
In general, smart people have long come up with the idea that if the existence of something cannot be fundamentally refuted and proved, then it is better just not to think about it and do something more useful.
The church god and the Bible God are two different things. The church god does not exist, but the Biblical god does, and he is quite material. He sends down fire from the heavens, shakes the earth, throws hail, and punishes those who worship the molten calf.
And for the fifth and last time, he goes to fulfill his prophecies.
Here in the third part everything is explained.
The burden of proof is on the APPROVER.
If there is NO cat in the room, then there is NO need to prove its absence.
For this reason, it is necessary to prove only the EXISTENCE of something, and NOT the absence of it.
https://youtu.be/8uY-f5fXa0o
*
They don't exist and never did … No one in the entire existence of mankind has ever been able to prove even with a half hint or some other evidence that God does not exist. And this is not a paradox of being It is simply not possible to deny the obvious … I can say that America doesn't exist because I've never been there but I can't say it 100% because there were hundreds of millions of people who were not just in America but also live there … It is the same with God… There are millions of people who have seen it and hundreds of millions who live with it … How can this be denied ???
And why prove the absence? Evidence should be sought by someone who claims the presence of something, not the absence. For example, I can say that somewhere in space there is a cat, but it is simply impossible to detect it with any devices. It's the same here.
Why prove it? There is everything that is described in legends, writings, literature, films, sculptures, paintings, etc. And Cheburashka, and Jehovah, and Sauron, and Santa Claus, and Yahweh, and Kolobok and Winnie the Pooh and everything, everything, everything…
Who is God?
About God, who is credited with free will, the ability to create out of nothing, to break causal relationships and substantial immateriality-the proof is one: all of the above is impossible, because it is absurd.
If you understand something different by God, please describe it