4 Answers

  1. a subject is someone entering into a legal relationship: a natural legal entity or a third person.

    an object is what the legal relations that the subject enters into are aimed at.

  2. The question is rather ambiguous. For example, in management, the subject is the one who manages, the object is the one who is affected.

    In philosophy, the subject is the one who knows something, and the object is what the thought is directed at. And so on. The values depend on the situation and environment.

  3. The user at the top is simply unrealistically difficult to answer 😶

    Everything is as simple as possible:�

    1) Object – something that is being studied; something that is being experimented on; something that is the object of research.

    2) Subject – the one who studies, makes experience, research.

  4. The subject is open to the world around him and is ready to experience, reflect and comprehend it. It affects the existential status of a person in the world as a preoccupied (engaged) subject, as defined by M. Heidegger. (to better understand this, I suggest reading Heidegger's writings on existentialism)

    The object of knowledge reflects the connection that is given to the subject independently of it. The content of the object emphasizes that the subject is permeated by cosmic connections, that it has a dimensionless being. In M. Heidegger, the object reveals the significance of the subject, its structural formations, which are not yet voiced, but are given to it. Some of them existed as subject forms, but disappeared in the fog of cultural traditions, others are biased, but not voiced or perceived by the subject.

    The world of objects, absolutized in positivism, became the basis of primary experience mediated by technical means, linguistic symbolism, and human constructiveness, becoming the opposite of the world of natural science.�

    The content of the term “subject” refers to a person, collective, society, society, political structure, etc. However, when revealing the semantic side of this concept, one should keep in mind the different involvement of a particular person in the world of such a multi-content substantial datum. This does not mean that a society learns, or a political party forms an empirical or theoretical cognitive situation. Cognition is carried out by the individual, but the measure of correspondence of the subject to the object is different and occurs at different levels. Unity as the identity and difference of the subject with the object has a very wide field of connections.�

    In other words, scientific knowledge expresses nature, society, and the person himself, his consciousness, with varying degrees of accuracy in subject – object relations, forming a cultural and historical environment. This pair of categories does not express anything else in itself, everything else is specific.�

    However, in the context of semantic, primarily ideological orientation, this pair of philosophical generalities has a meaning of great epistemological importance. The object of knowledge is the result of the interaction of subject and object. The main defining feature of the subject of knowledge is its practical origin. The subject of knowledge is set by practice. Of course, it can be of different quality, have different shapes, but it is always real. A body of knowledge cannot be the subject of private sciences, otherwise science outside of practice will cease to function, become self-contained, and break away from real life processes.

    P.S.

    Unfortunately, some authors understand the subject of knowledge as a collection of knowledge, especially when it is widely symbolized, as in mathematics, or abstracted, as in the field of computer graphics. The reason for this is the lack of understanding of at least two problematic epistemological aspects. This, in my opinion, is the root of the problem of understanding these two concepts.

Leave a Reply

Categories