Russia's problem is that it doesn't know what it wants. The monarchy was tired, communism did not take root, and capitalism was not as good as it was imagined by the Soviet people?
Russia is just a huge, unkempt territory. The territory can't want to or not want to. The problem with the RF population is that it is very trusting and simple-minded ( this applies to 90% of the population, but not to the farmers who are in power in the RFII). The monarchy in Russia is not” tired”, but has objectively outlived its usefulness. There has never been any real communism in this territory. Modern RF “capitalism” is not such either. The modern RF government is best described as a criminal-clan kleptocracy. And this is a huge problem of the territory and its population.
And who is Russia? The monarchists are alive. There was no communism, and there was nothing to take root in. Capitalism turned out to be as we knew it, different. Some Soviet people in it became masters, others were reduced to serfs. But it is precisely this serf who strictly gives capitalism the go-ahead. By voting for it. So it's still good for everyone.
Stalin's role in the history of human development surpasses the historical significance of all dictators who existed before him.
Having destroyed Lenin's Bolshevik government and experienced military personnel who had won the war against world imperialist intervention (the so-called “Civil War”), having shot and repressed most of the specialists who had accepted Soviet power and their students, Stalin declared himself the main Bolshevik and thereby cut off the targeting of the only possible path of development of human society – the society of workers ' power.
There will be no peaceful development of mankind until a firm assessment of the historical role of the activities of Stalin the dictator is given.
it seems that there was a king and then there were people who he somehow prevented unless there were a lot of them and they were all the people hardly and then everything changed by the way under the king like there was capitalism I don't know developed or not very much but did everyone like it too probably for example writers had questions about its meaning for an individual for a small person and that the stratification was well-fed and not very rich and not very much then they built socialism people got used to novelty like they got used to even flying into space and developing science and in movies there were directors who pleased their viewers and then again the experiment began perestroika and other joys for the authorities and that it became better for someone probably got better with their factories planes and przdniki at their villas and trips to resorts narodd can and wants but he needs to be asked about this but for now, as it seems, he is thinking about the situation
I do not know what Russia wants (the concept is too generalized), but I am sure that everyone wants to live with dignity. Therefore, the problem is the problem of the Government, which is not able to provide this. And it doesn't matter what form it is in the-ism , as long as the-ism is impotent. The presence of state structures, institutions, and attributes does not indicate the existence of a State at all, if the state is dependent on external factors (exchanges, world money, investments, and loans). The state can be called the state that can write its own laws in this area, and not follow the recommendations of the owner from behind the hill. The knowledge of this area is laid down in the Holy Scriptures, which the Church cannot explain, and the Authorities are unable to understand due to the lack of scientific knowledge.
It's just that the people of Russia don't want to work on themselves and their civic consciousness. They constantly try to shift the responsibility to the leader, the leader, the tsar, and then scold him. And the most cunning and impudent of the available ones takes the lead. And what would he do when he grew up in such a society? Of course, to steal and filonit, only in a cunning way and best of all. This is Russia's biggest problem. Laziness, theft, and irresponsibility.
Russia is just a huge, unkempt territory. The territory can't want to or not want to. The problem with the RF population is that it is very trusting and simple-minded ( this applies to 90% of the population, but not to the farmers who are in power in the RFII). The monarchy in Russia is not” tired”, but has objectively outlived its usefulness. There has never been any real communism in this territory. Modern RF “capitalism” is not such either. The modern RF government is best described as a criminal-clan kleptocracy. And this is a huge problem of the territory and its population.
And who is Russia? The monarchists are alive. There was no communism, and there was nothing to take root in. Capitalism turned out to be as we knew it, different. Some Soviet people in it became masters, others were reduced to serfs. But it is precisely this serf who strictly gives capitalism the go-ahead. By voting for it. So it's still good for everyone.
Stalin's role in the history of human development surpasses the historical significance of all dictators who existed before him.
Having destroyed Lenin's Bolshevik government and experienced military personnel who had won the war against world imperialist intervention (the so-called “Civil War”), having shot and repressed most of the specialists who had accepted Soviet power and their students, Stalin declared himself the main Bolshevik and thereby cut off the targeting of the only possible path of development of human society – the society of workers ' power.
There will be no peaceful development of mankind until a firm assessment of the historical role of the activities of Stalin the dictator is given.
it seems that there was a king and then there were people who he somehow prevented unless there were a lot of them and they were all the people hardly and then everything changed by the way under the king like there was capitalism I don't know developed or not very much but did everyone like it too probably for example writers had questions about its meaning for an individual for a small person and that the stratification was well-fed and not very rich and not very much then they built socialism people got used to novelty like they got used to even flying into space and developing science and in movies there were directors who pleased their viewers and then again the experiment began perestroika and other joys for the authorities and that it became better for someone probably got better with their factories planes and przdniki at their villas and trips to resorts narodd can and wants but he needs to be asked about this but for now, as it seems, he is thinking about the situation
I do not know what Russia wants (the concept is too generalized), but I am sure that everyone wants to live with dignity. Therefore, the problem is the problem of the Government, which is not able to provide this. And it doesn't matter what form it is in the-ism , as long as the-ism is impotent. The presence of state structures, institutions, and attributes does not indicate the existence of a State at all, if the state is dependent on external factors (exchanges, world money, investments, and loans). The state can be called the state that can write its own laws in this area, and not follow the recommendations of the owner from behind the hill. The knowledge of this area is laid down in the Holy Scriptures, which the Church cannot explain, and the Authorities are unable to understand due to the lack of scientific knowledge.
It's just that the people of Russia don't want to work on themselves and their civic consciousness. They constantly try to shift the responsibility to the leader, the leader, the tsar, and then scold him. And the most cunning and impudent of the available ones takes the lead. And what would he do when he grew up in such a society? Of course, to steal and filonit, only in a cunning way and best of all. This is Russia's biggest problem. Laziness, theft, and irresponsibility.