2 Answers

  1. The question” why ” implies a goal. But only a living being can set a goal. Not necessarily intelligent, but just alive. For example, a crow builds a nest to hatch its chicks, a mole digs a hole to live in, etc. In the non-living world, no one sets goals. For example: why is it raining, why is the sun shining, why is the river flowing? You can only answer the question “why”, that is, what were the reasons for this phenomenon. Of course, if we assume that the universe was created by a living being, then it had some purpose. But there are no signs or evidence of this. Stars, planets, and galaxies were most likely created as a result of natural processes. Therefore, we can only study how and why our universe came into being. There are many theories on this topic (for example, the big Bang and others). For example, watch a video about different hypotheses of scientists on this topic

    https://yandex.ru/video/preview/?text=ученые%20открыли%20излучение%20до%20большого%20взрыва%20ереван%20ютуб&path=wizard&parent-reqid=1614979194316850-189163281294968816300284-production-app-host-sas-web-yp-247&wiz_type=vital&filmId=7363437593834437268

  2. Science does not answer the question “why”. Science explores how things work. The question” why ” suggests that someone, the Supreme, created the universe, and we must psychoanalyze him and understand why this universe surrendered to him. This has nothing to do with science.

    My own guess about the nature of the universe is that someone from a more advanced world than ours created a virtual amusement park Earth and a planetarium in the form of an image of the universe around for the entertainment of the respectable public.

    This also does not answer the question of creating the first non-virtual world, but at least it pushes this moment so far into infinity that it is easier to accept that you will not be able to find out.

Leave a Reply