Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
As a rule, this term refers to those who excessively try to reduce the discussion to the jungle of morality – morality, by its very definition, is subjective.
There, when discussing, for example, the emancipation of the peasants in 1861, the moralist's arguments will look like ” Emancipation is good, because there is more freedom. And freedom is good” or ” Liberation is bad because unity is broken. But unity is good”, which merges the discussion of a specific social phenomenon with clear social consequences in the direction of ” Unity or freedom? Which of these abstract concepts is more valuable?”