It is inappropriate and ridiculous to compare giants of Science and dwarf philosophy.
PHILOSOPHY is mainly a party-political conjuncture science, which is completely unknown to schoolchildren and ordinary people, is slightly known to people with higher education, and is “terribly far” from being of practical use to anyone.
Brilliant Socratic Philosophers+Confucius – a very few highly respected persons-is “a precious bright drop in the muddy sea of all mountain philosophy.”
Most people don't quite understand the word, and its meaning, philosophy correctly. Any author, any work – – – philosopher, any sane person – – – philosopher, a person who has lived 65-80 years-philosophers. A gifted philosopher-sage! There are very few sages, of course. Their works are a guide to the lives of all other people for many thousands of years. What they predicted many thousands of years ago, science is only now learning. And so make your own conclusions about the benefits of philosophy compared to the contributions of science. With respect.
Modern philosophy has explained in general terms the world and the place of man in it. It was the philosopher who heralded the Apocalypse in the second decade of the 21st century. Philosophy explained that we live in a world created by humans, not by God.
Philosophy is wisdom.Is wisdom useless? Developed countries are the ones with the most money. Not those who have made the most progress in peacemaking, human love, and the developed value system, but those who have earned the most money.Yes, this parameter is specific and far from obvious, but we take it for granted.
So with wealthy people, for some reason, they call the wealthy one who has more money.
For example, our ancestors had more honors for those who did something valiant.
Or here the actors play real characters, heroes are warriors. Actors get millions even though the main character lives almost in poverty. Yes, the actors honestly earned their name, but they play those who need to be admired and at the same time we love and honor not these heroes, but the heroes who played.
But it's not so much the baby thing as the fact that we accept the dominance of other ideas and accept them very easily.we are not taught to understand ideas.Yes, we are taught science as if it will solve all problems.Science gives you a lot, but there are some things that it just can't give you .
Science responds:what is in the world, but only philosophy and how it should be.The science:Let's get to point B. Philosophy:Do I need to get to point B?
Do they teach us math, physics, and chemistry at school? If the smart woodpeckers zaprvlyayut us.And when they make changes, we don't even notice them.Try using science verification methods to answer your questions:what do we strive for?what is truth?how to build a state? should there be a state?what are human rights?imagine that a scientist is using a microscope or reactor to learn about the law and prove its legitimacy.Rights exist because a group of intelligent people (philosophers) decided that rights should exist.
Many people are interested in politics, but it is inseparable from philosophy.But the answers and concepts to politics seem to come down from the spheres above.Even those who shout: philosophers are not needed do not understand that this is a philosophical judgment.
Opyatki we are taught biology, mathematics, chemistry but we are not taught what is it for?how not to harm yourself and others?how are our forces used?how to do the right thing?
Philosophy is cut off and we are not taught this, and as a result, a tychnically chained force grows up that effectively performs tasks.But why does it perform them?she's not allowed to know.This population accepts that developed countries are rich and self-development is about money and that war is about business. (I apologize if I made grammatical mistakes. I'm not from Russia, but I read books and watch movies in Russian, but I'm seriously lame with orthography.I hope you ponel what I wanted to say)
But its practical outcome is blood, g… and tears everywhere. And there is not a single disaster that is not provoked by philosophy. These are the religious wars, the First and Second World Wars, the revolution, Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler. This is the extermination of the greater, better half of humanity. The Plague is resting with the atomic bomb.
I can imagine who likes it…
This is the price of philosophy, in the place of an exhaustive solution of specific situational problems, in the place of determining the constructiveness of the phenomena of reality.
But it is precisely this movement that easily piles up in the social vanguard, precisely because of the brainlessness of the majority that overwhelms each other, which is a special pleasure for it.
Philosophy is the mother of all sciences, as it has been since antiquity. And neither she nor any of the others give up their kinship. Any scientific question arises initially as a philosophical one. And philosophy is the guide and method of new knowledge. The results of cognition are included in both professional and mass philosophy. Each person has philosophical views as his own or shared with others worldview.
Once upon a time, philosophy was the only science. The science of everything. The philosophical method of observation and reasoning was out of competition because there was nothing to compete with.
But the main path of progress is the path of specialization and cooperation. Specialization has also begun in science. For each subject of study, a separate science appeared, with its own specialized (therefore more effective) methods and results that provide predictive power.
Is there still something useful left in philosophy, or is it empty, like the chrysalis from which the butterfly of modern science hatched?
At least the history of philosophy remains, which is no small thing.
But there is also an interesting “reverse movement”. Each science forms its own philosophy at a certain stage. Unfortunately, to study, for example, the philosophy of physics, you must first be a physicist. Here reasoning must be based on knowledge of a huge number of facts and laws.
Yes of course! There are many philosophies and directions, which one you will choose and walk along such a path! There is the philosophy of a medic, the philosophy of a worker, the philosophy of religion, even bandits have their own philosophy, but the results are different, from all-encompassing grace to fierce death!!! The choice is up to the individual!!!
I really like Epicurus 'definition of philosophy:” Philosophy is an activity that, through conversations and reflections, gives a person a happy, serene life.” In this sense, if we consider philosophy as a special discursive practice, where the object is human life, the method is reason, and the goal is his well-being and happiness, it can bring very tangible benefits to humanity as a whole and to individual people in it. And the fact that all people, in the end, strive for happiness, well, Pascal wrote:”All people strive for happiness — there are no exceptions to this rule; everyone has different ways, but the goal is the same… Happiness is the motivation for any actions of any person, even those who are going to hang themselves”)
Logic is always there, even if there is no truth. no philosophy. For example, there is a logical connection. but there is no truth in the following: “you say that because you (don't) smoke yourself”, “that's what troechniki usually write”, “You say that because you are from Ukraine”, “You say that because you are from Russia”, “Hitler was a vegetarian, you need to be just as crazy to be a vegetarian”, “the authority said this, don't you believe him?”
What other science, other than philosophy, can conclude that clarity, evidence, simplicity, clarity, soundness of observation, clarity, comprehensibility, general acceptance, and social significance cannot be a self-sufficient criterion of truth?
“Clarity is so inherent in truth that they are often confused” (C).Яс” Clarity and evidence are so inherent in truth that many people take any clarity for truth ” (C).
“Here, according to a sound observation of the clarity and evidence of the sun's passage through the sky during the day from sunrise to sunset, and after the same period of time, the appearance of the sun again in the east, can lead and led to the conclusion that the Sun rotates around the Earth. But such evidence, clarity and sound judgment had to be abandoned in favor of the opposite-the heliocentric structure of the planetary system. “(C). Claude A. Helvetius: “Intelligence ends where common sense begins.”
The main methods of philosophy are doubt, collation, comparison and identification of the general. “Contradiction is the criterion of truth, and the absence of contradiction is the criterion of error” (G. Hegel).�
Here they asked the question ” what principles can you deduce based on your worldview?” and you can see my answer. Philosophy is the only thing that brought out my worldview and principles.
It is inappropriate and ridiculous to compare giants of Science and dwarf philosophy.
PHILOSOPHY is mainly a party-political conjuncture science, which is completely unknown to schoolchildren and ordinary people, is slightly known to people with higher education, and is “terribly far” from being of practical use to anyone.
Brilliant Socratic Philosophers+Confucius – a very few highly respected persons-is “a precious bright drop in the muddy sea of all mountain philosophy.”
Most people don't quite understand the word, and its meaning, philosophy correctly. Any author, any work – – – philosopher, any sane person – – – philosopher, a person who has lived 65-80 years-philosophers. A gifted philosopher-sage! There are very few sages, of course. Their works are a guide to the lives of all other people for many thousands of years. What they predicted many thousands of years ago, science is only now learning. And so make your own conclusions about the benefits of philosophy compared to the contributions of science. With respect.
Modern philosophy has explained in general terms the world and the place of man in it. It was the philosopher who heralded the Apocalypse in the second decade of the 21st century. Philosophy explained that we live in a world created by humans, not by God.
Philosophy is wisdom.Is wisdom useless?
Developed countries are the ones with the most money. Not those who have made the most progress in peacemaking, human love, and the developed value system, but those who have earned the most money.Yes, this parameter is specific and far from obvious, but we take it for granted.
So with wealthy people, for some reason, they call the wealthy one who has more money.
For example, our ancestors had more honors for those who did something valiant.
Or here the actors play real characters, heroes are warriors. Actors get millions even though the main character lives almost in poverty. Yes, the actors honestly earned their name, but they play those who need to be admired and at the same time we love and honor not these heroes, but the heroes who played.
But it's not so much the baby thing as the fact that we accept the dominance of other ideas and accept them very easily.we are not taught to understand ideas.Yes, we are taught science as if it will solve all problems.Science gives you a lot, but there are some things that it just can't give you .
Science responds:what is in the world, but only philosophy and how it should be.The science:Let's get to point B. Philosophy:Do I need to get to point B?
Do they teach us math, physics, and chemistry at school? If the smart woodpeckers zaprvlyayut us.And when they make changes, we don't even notice them.Try using science verification methods to answer your questions:what do we strive for?what is truth?how to build a state? should there be a state?what are human rights?imagine that a scientist is using a microscope or reactor to learn about the law and prove its legitimacy.Rights exist because a group of intelligent people (philosophers) decided that rights should exist.
Many people are interested in politics, but it is inseparable from philosophy.But the answers and concepts to politics seem to come down from the spheres above.Even those who shout: philosophers are not needed do not understand that this is a philosophical judgment.
Opyatki we are taught biology, mathematics, chemistry but we are not taught what is it for?how not to harm yourself and others?how are our forces used?how to do the right thing?
Philosophy is cut off and we are not taught this, and as a result, a tychnically chained force grows up that effectively performs tasks.But why does it perform them?she's not allowed to know.This population accepts that developed countries are rich and self-development is about money and that war is about business.
(I apologize if I made grammatical mistakes. I'm not from Russia, but I read books and watch movies in Russian, but I'm seriously lame with orthography.I hope you ponel what I wanted to say)
That's what they call it, philosophy.
But its practical outcome is blood, g… and tears everywhere. And there is not a single disaster that is not provoked by philosophy. These are the religious wars, the First and Second World Wars, the revolution, Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler. This is the extermination of the greater, better half of humanity. The Plague is resting with the atomic bomb.
I can imagine who likes it…
This is the price of philosophy, in the place of an exhaustive solution of specific situational problems, in the place of determining the constructiveness of the phenomena of reality.
But it is precisely this movement that easily piles up in the social vanguard, precisely because of the brainlessness of the majority that overwhelms each other, which is a special pleasure for it.
Philosophy is the mother of all sciences, as it has been since antiquity. And neither she nor any of the others give up their kinship. Any scientific question arises initially as a philosophical one. And philosophy is the guide and method of new knowledge. The results of cognition are included in both professional and mass philosophy. Each person has philosophical views as his own or shared with others worldview.
Once upon a time, philosophy was the only science. The science of everything. The philosophical method of observation and reasoning was out of competition because there was nothing to compete with.
But the main path of progress is the path of specialization and cooperation. Specialization has also begun in science. For each subject of study, a separate science appeared, with its own specialized (therefore more effective) methods and results that provide predictive power.
Is there still something useful left in philosophy, or is it empty, like the chrysalis from which the butterfly of modern science hatched?
At least the history of philosophy remains, which is no small thing.
But there is also an interesting “reverse movement”. Each science forms its own philosophy at a certain stage. Unfortunately, to study, for example, the philosophy of physics, you must first be a physicist. Here reasoning must be based on knowledge of a huge number of facts and laws.
Yes of course! There are many philosophies and directions, which one you will choose and walk along such a path! There is the philosophy of a medic, the philosophy of a worker, the philosophy of religion, even bandits have their own philosophy, but the results are different, from all-encompassing grace to fierce death!!! The choice is up to the individual!!!
I really like Epicurus 'definition of philosophy:” Philosophy is an activity that, through conversations and reflections, gives a person a happy, serene life.” In this sense, if we consider philosophy as a special discursive practice, where the object is human life, the method is reason, and the goal is his well-being and happiness, it can bring very tangible benefits to humanity as a whole and to individual people in it. And the fact that all people, in the end, strive for happiness, well, Pascal wrote:”All people strive for happiness — there are no exceptions to this rule; everyone has different ways, but the goal is the same… Happiness is the motivation for any actions of any person, even those who are going to hang themselves”)
Logic is always there, even if there is no truth. no philosophy. For example, there is a logical connection. but there is no truth in the following: “you say that because you (don't) smoke yourself”, “that's what troechniki usually write”, “You say that because you are from Ukraine”, “You say that because you are from Russia”, “Hitler was a vegetarian, you need to be just as crazy to be a vegetarian”, “the authority said this, don't you believe him?”
What other science, other than philosophy, can conclude that clarity, evidence, simplicity, clarity, soundness of observation, clarity, comprehensibility, general acceptance, and social significance cannot be a self-sufficient criterion of truth?
“Clarity is so inherent in truth that they are often confused” (C).Яс” Clarity and evidence are so inherent in truth that many people take any clarity for truth ” (C).
“Here, according to a sound observation of the clarity and evidence of the sun's passage through the sky during the day from sunrise to sunset, and after the same period of time, the appearance of the sun again in the east, can lead and led to the conclusion that the Sun rotates around the Earth. But such evidence, clarity and sound judgment had to be abandoned in favor of the opposite-the heliocentric structure of the planetary system. “(C). Claude A. Helvetius: “Intelligence ends where common sense begins.”
The main methods of philosophy are doubt, collation, comparison and identification of the general. “Contradiction is the criterion of truth, and the absence of contradiction is the criterion of error” (G. Hegel).�
Here they asked the question ” what principles can you deduce based on your worldview?” and you can see my answer. Philosophy is the only thing that brought out my worldview and principles.