4 Answers

  1. Extremely general statements are formed on the basis of a generalization of a number of specific statements, so the statement “power is right” can only be given a logical assessment. It was created without violating the laws of logic.

    And power is right. And right is power.

    And then there are questions.

    Who is the subject of the law? And who is the subject of the force? Individual or state? Criminal or judge? What is the legal framework in which force is used?

    What is meant by the word power? The power of what or who? Force of Law or force outside the law? Physical strength or the power of authority? The power of love or the power of persuasion?

    Therefore, estimates will depend on the concreteness of both concepts, and on the ratio in which they will be used.

  2. “Power is right” refers to the animal world, and if you follow this statement, then a person is no different from an animal. But man is endowed with intelligence and intelligence that distinguish him from animals. Thanks to these tools, a person is able to learn knowledge, change, be aware of their actions, study and determine the laws, observe them and live by the laws. Respect yourself and other people. With respect.

  3. In general, this is true. In human society, when they say that everyone is equal before the law, they omit that the entire “power” of the state is behind this statement. Try to break it and they will put you in jail by force (not by persuasion).

    In Jules Verne, Captain Nemo, when protesting by what right he deprived uninvited guests of their liberty on his Nautilus, replies: “by the right of the strong.” Quite, like, a positive hero of school literature for young people.

    The illusion that “right” is an inherent privilege of any human being is dispelled after the first successful robbery of this person. God grant everyone to avoid it.

  4. I find a contradiction in this equation. This is a contradiction between the individual and the conditioned. The separate cannot be conditioned by something external, and the conditioned manifests itself only in inseparable phenomena.

    By force, we usually mean the measure of the impact of a particular phenomenon on the outside world. That is, we select a part of the whole world and observe its influence on other parts.

    By right, we usually mean rules of conduct that are determined by contracts between people. There are several related parties that are in some kind of relationship with each other and describe their relationships and connections using rights. All these parties are bound by these rules in a single whole. They are all interdependent. If one part of the whole system changes, then the other parts will also be forced to react to this change. That is, this system tends to balance or harmony.

    Eg. A human is physically stronger than a bee. It can easily destroy a bee or even a swarm of bees. If they are considered as separate parts from each other, then it seems that the strength and capabilities of a person give him the right to do whatever he wants with bees. But if we consider humans and bees as parts of an equilibrium ecosystem, then the causal connections become clear. If, for example, a person destroys all the bees on the planet, then more than 80% of flowering plants will remain without pollination and will not be able to reproduce. As a result, the animals that feed on these plants will die out, and an ecological catastrophe will arise in which the survival of humanity will be called into question. People will have to restore the balance and create some artificial analogs of pollinating bees. To prevent this from happening, people create laws that protect the right of bees to live. For example, they restrict industrial atmospheric emissions and the use of toxic chemicals that kill bees. That is, bees become an element of legal relations.

Leave a Reply

Categories