Two concepts “EGG” and “CHICKEN” are given, and in a SERIES of SEQUENTIALLY DEVELOPED CONCEPTS (RPRP), it is necessary to find the concepts preceding each of them.
In the RPRP, “EGG” is preceded by “CHICKEN”, because the concept of “embryo” (or others ) we can ignore those that are not of interest to us in the formulation of the question.
In the RPRP, the neglected concept for” CHICKEN “is” chicken”, but not” cracked egg (from which the chicken is trying to hatch)”, because in the formulation of the question, attention is not focused on the obligation to consider only the egg of the integral state, i.e. for” CHICKEN ” the previous one is not the concept on which the question is focused, but its variety.
OUTPUT: “CHICKEN”
The concept of “Immobile (Achilles)” is given, which does not consist in the RPRP and the absence of a dynamic state in which is veiled by movements, which I follow Zeno, and we rearrange this concept to the previous positions in the RPRP of the concept of “Moving (turtle)” – this is the whole mystery of this Zeno aporia. Even Usain Bolt can't compete with the turtle in this way…
This is more an illustration of the properties of countable sets than some kind of paradox.�
(a set is called countable if it is possible to construct a one-to-one correspondence between its elements and the set of all natural numbers)�
Which set do you think is “bigger”: the set of honest natural numbers,�, or the set of all integers(that is, also negative numbers)? This may sound somewhat paradoxical, but they are equally powerful, they are countable sets.(there are as many of them as there are natural ones).�
Hilbert's hotel has an infinite number of rooms. In other words, we can always accommodate no more than a finite or even infinite number of guests by regrouping the existing guests. Since there are an infinite number of rooms, we can always free up the first few by moving someone deeper into the infinite corridor of rooms.
SOLVING PARADOXES:
Two concepts “EGG” and “CHICKEN” are given, and in a SERIES of SEQUENTIALLY DEVELOPED CONCEPTS (RPRP), it is necessary to find the concepts preceding each of them.
In the RPRP, “EGG” is preceded by “CHICKEN”, because the concept of “embryo” (or others ) we can ignore those that are not of interest to us in the formulation of the question.
In the RPRP, the neglected concept for” CHICKEN “is” chicken”, but not” cracked egg (from which the chicken is trying to hatch)”, because in the formulation of the question, attention is not focused on the obligation to consider only the egg of the integral state, i.e. for” CHICKEN ” the previous one is not the concept on which the question is focused, but its variety.
OUTPUT: “CHICKEN”
This is more an illustration of the properties of countable sets than some kind of paradox.�
(a set is called countable if it is possible to construct a one-to-one correspondence between its elements and the set of all natural numbers)�
Which set do you think is “bigger”: the set of honest natural numbers,�, or the set of all integers(that is, also negative numbers)? This may sound somewhat paradoxical, but they are equally powerful, they are countable sets.(there are as many of them as there are natural ones).�
Hilbert's hotel has an infinite number of rooms. In other words, we can always accommodate no more than a finite or even infinite number of guests by regrouping the existing guests. Since there are an infinite number of rooms, we can always free up the first few by moving someone deeper into the infinite corridor of rooms.