If, in our humble opinion, “nothing” is the absence of everything: objects, phenomena,processes,interactions, that is, the absence of all possible characteristics related to real objects or phenomena. Then, starting from the definition of “exists”, it means that it manifests itself somehow, somewhere, on something.But as we found out, it does not have any characteristics, that is, “nothing” can manifest itself in any way, because there is something everywhere. Just like it can't affect anything, everything has a cause and effect,but something can't come out of nowhere .And it also cannot be located in space, because any object in space has a length, width, height, and also it has a certain location in space by its materiality, but this does not apply to “nothing”.Actually, the very concept of space is already “something”. It turns out that nothing can exist.In any case, having such a theoretical understanding of the concept of “nothing”, we can draw the following conclusions:
If, in our humble opinion, “nothing” is the absence of everything: objects, phenomena,processes,interactions, that is, the absence of all possible characteristics related to real objects or phenomena. Then, starting from the definition of “exists”, it means that it manifests itself somehow, somewhere, on something.But as we found out, it does not have any characteristics, that is, “nothing” can manifest itself in any way, because there is something everywhere. Just like it can't affect anything, everything has a cause and effect,but something can't come out of nowhere .And it also cannot be located in space, because any object in space has a length, width, height, and also it has a certain location in space by its materiality, but this does not apply to “nothing”.Actually, the very concept of space is already “something”. It turns out that nothing can exist.In any case, having such a theoretical understanding of the concept of “nothing”, we can draw such conclusions.
From a physical point of view. Yes, before the universe appeared, there was Nothing. That was over 13 mld years ago. The Bible says that God created the world out of nothing – in a sense, this is true, science has confirmed. The physicist Laurence Krauss wrote a book about it, All Out of Nothing
there is, first of all, because Everything could not just be always, because this requires an initial certain set of rules-values, and these values had to come from somewhere.
and secondly, in our universe there is a symmetry of all phenomena, which means that the opposite value of Everything should be Nothing
It seems to me that the problem is also something else: even if nothing exists, is a person capable of realizing it? After all, just as the infinite cannot fit into our consciousness, so we cannot understand the absolute absence of anything.
Suppose a person is standing in front of this room described in the first answer — so what? How does he see her? The mind always clings to what is inside, because “not being” is nonsense.
What is nothing? The absence of bodies and particles at each point in space? But what about the various waves and radiations? And what else does a person not know? Was the state of the universe before the Big Bang “nothing”?
So first you need to determine “nothing” and whether a person can perceive it.
Let's imagine that you have a large room.The size of a football field,for example.The room is locked and has no windows or doors. There is nothing inside the room.Absolute emptiness.It doesn't even have air in it.So, what's going to happen now?Now let's say your goal is to put something in this room.But the rules are as follows:�in order to do this, you can't use anything that is outside the room. What would you do?
You decide to create a spark in the room.After all, then there will be light in the room, even if only for a moment.This can be described as something.Everything is correct,but there is one but.You're out of the room.So, this idea is not accepted.
Then you decide to teleport something into the room,such as a star.But this idea is also not accepted,since you use a thing that is located outside the room.This raises a dilemma, since you can put something inside the room using only what is inside the room. In our case, there is nothing inside the room.
This black boundless room has no light, not a speck of dust, not the slightest bit of anything. There is no air, not the slightest element, not a single molecule. There is absolutely nothing. I think we can safely say that this is nothing.
“Nothing” does not exist, as Parmenides said 2.5 thousand years ago – ” There is being, there is no non-being.”�
In addition, existence is precisely the existence of something as a thing (and not just a fact that can be called a word). There is A CONCEPT OF “nothing”, but “nothing” itself-as a “no-thing” – does not exist.
Why a person can come up with concepts that do not exist and that it is even impossible for him to imagine-this is another question.
If, in our humble opinion, “nothing” is the absence of everything: objects, phenomena,processes,interactions, that is, the absence of all possible characteristics related to real objects or phenomena. Then, starting from the definition of “exists”, it means that it manifests itself somehow, somewhere, on something.But as we found out, it does not have any characteristics, that is, “nothing” can manifest itself in any way, because there is something everywhere. Just like it can't affect anything, everything has a cause and effect,but something can't come out of nowhere .And it also cannot be located in space, because any object in space has a length, width, height, and also it has a certain location in space by its materiality, but this does not apply to “nothing”.Actually, the very concept of space is already “something”. It turns out that nothing can exist.In any case, having such a theoretical understanding of the concept of “nothing”, we can draw the following conclusions:
If, in our humble opinion, “nothing” is the absence of everything: objects, phenomena,processes,interactions, that is, the absence of all possible characteristics related to real objects or phenomena. Then, starting from the definition of “exists”, it means that it manifests itself somehow, somewhere, on something.But as we found out, it does not have any characteristics, that is, “nothing” can manifest itself in any way, because there is something everywhere. Just like it can't affect anything, everything has a cause and effect,but something can't come out of nowhere .And it also cannot be located in space, because any object in space has a length, width, height, and also it has a certain location in space by its materiality, but this does not apply to “nothing”.Actually, the very concept of space is already “something”. It turns out that nothing can exist.In any case, having such a theoretical understanding of the concept of “nothing”, we can draw such conclusions.
There is a philosophical concept of “Nothing”
From a physical point of view. Yes, before the universe appeared, there was Nothing. That was over 13 mld years ago. The Bible says that God created the world out of nothing – in a sense, this is true, science has confirmed. The physicist Laurence Krauss wrote a book about it, All Out of Nothing
https://www.livelib.ru/book/1002994667-vsjo-iz-nichego-kak-voznikla-vselennaya-lorens-krauss
there is, first of all, because Everything could not just be always, because this requires an initial certain set of rules-values, and these values had to come from somewhere.
and secondly, in our universe there is a symmetry of all phenomena, which means that the opposite value of Everything should be Nothing
It seems to me that the problem is also something else: even if nothing exists, is a person capable of realizing it? After all, just as the infinite cannot fit into our consciousness, so we cannot understand the absolute absence of anything.
Suppose a person is standing in front of this room described in the first answer — so what? How does he see her? The mind always clings to what is inside, because “not being” is nonsense.
What is nothing? The absence of bodies and particles at each point in space? But what about the various waves and radiations? And what else does a person not know? Was the state of the universe before the Big Bang “nothing”?
So first you need to determine “nothing” and whether a person can perceive it.
Let's imagine that you have a large room.The size of a football field,for example.The room is locked and has no windows or doors. There is nothing inside the room.Absolute emptiness.It doesn't even have air in it.So, what's going to happen now?Now let's say your goal is to put something in this room.But the rules are as follows:�in order to do this, you can't use anything that is outside the room. What would you do?
You decide to create a spark in the room.After all, then there will be light in the room, even if only for a moment.This can be described as something.Everything is correct,but there is one but.You're out of the room.So, this idea is not accepted.
Then you decide to teleport something into the room,such as a star.But this idea is also not accepted,since you use a thing that is located outside the room.This raises a dilemma, since you can put something inside the room using only what is inside the room. In our case, there is nothing inside the room.
This black boundless room has no light, not a speck of dust, not the slightest bit of anything. There is no air, not the slightest element, not a single molecule. There is absolutely nothing. I think we can safely say that this is nothing.
“Nothing” does not exist, as Parmenides said 2.5 thousand years ago – ” There is being, there is no non-being.”�
In addition, existence is precisely the existence of something as a thing (and not just a fact that can be called a word). There is A CONCEPT OF “nothing”, but “nothing” itself-as a “no-thing” – does not exist.
Why a person can come up with concepts that do not exist and that it is even impossible for him to imagine-this is another question.