6 Answers

    There is an opinion that the struggle of women for equality leads to their inheritance of male archetypes, behavioral patterns, masculine traits and pushing the boundaries of opportunities to achieve new social statuses previously considered male, which in some sense in its entirety turns a woman into a man. So from this point of view, yes, we would like to.

    In many ways, in culture for a long time, the masculine part is largely equal to the full-fledged and “universal”, but here it is important to highlight the word “partly”. but of course, they would not want to be men, because they criticize many traits as such and by definition.�

    It is important to note that they would not want to idealize violence in itself, they would not want to understand by equality “the right to harassment and exploitation of the individual,” the patriarchal right of self-valued violence as “natural”, and its cult, ” the right to a relationship of domination and humility with usurpation. the right to lack empathy and empathy over others, with impunity and support for bullying the strong over the weak, and so on.�

    From femininity, sincerity, empathy, kindness, compassion are very productive, from masculinity-determination, impenetrability, courage, revolutionary consciousness in the struggle for freedom and a merciless struggle against impenetrable blockheads for the sake of the goals of a humane society of the future, against a society based on lies, power and violence as a principle that turns People into barbarians.

    Instead of humility, it is the culmination, the answer to all the humiliation, to the millennial yoke, if you'll excuse the expression.�

    Perhaps, of course, the forced use of violence in response to violence (expropriation of expropriators) as part of the liberation dialectic.�

    Neither classical masculinity nor classical femininity will remain, but everything will simply mix, and a productive synthesis will be obtained as the main role model of the Personality of the future.

    I don't know how feminists wanted to become men or not, but I did. I even 20 years ago, even friends and sellers from whom I bought myself women's things advised me to change my gender, I myself dreamed about it, but it's not harmful to dream. The problem is financial.

    I answer as a feminist.

    No, I don't want to. I'm comfortable with my body and my gender. yes, women have their own problems, but men also have their own problems. so this will replace the awl with soap.

    (I don't see men as oppressors. in my opinion, women's problems are related to the social system)

    you need to change not your gender, but your life. and society.

    No. Feminists would like men to stop considering women as their servants, their “consumable”, imposing this role on women, leaving them the only possible way of self-realization only as a wife-mother.A
    woman is a human being, not an incubator.

    In addition, feminists would not want anyone to “change their gender” at all, because this desire in people only causes such a position in society when gender education creates a huge bias in the perception of women and men in society, creating a dominant, so-called “masculine” role for men and a subordinate, so-called “masculine” role for men. “feminine”, the role of women, while marginalizing all people whose biological sex does not correspond to their gender roles (homophobia is also from there, it is secondary to the gender oppression of women by men, gays are oppressed because they in some sense try on a” female ” role). Feminists call on society to get rid of the concept of gender and all that is associated with it. It is important to understand that they do not call for “ignoring biological differences”, they just call for noticing ONLY biological differences, and not imposing additional social differences on people, i.e. gender roles.

    I answer as a feminist 🙂

    From the point of view of biological differences-no, feminists do not want to be either men or as men. If one gender had a number of undeniable physiological advantages, and the other was obviously at a disadvantage in everything, not only transsexuals would need sex reassignment surgery. And the conditions for holding it would be different.�
    Not that any woman is always satisfied with her “feminine” body, but for the purposes of feminism and the same bodypositive, rather the opposite goal indicated in the question is to get rid of the so-called inner misogyny, and not try to be more “masculine” in everything, according to gender stereotypes.

    From the point of view of social injustice, you can, if you do not go deeper, superficially answer, they say, feminists want to be “like men”. That is, to have the same rights and freedoms.
    Some branches seek to abandon the understanding of a clear correspondence between “feminine – feminine” and “masculine-masculine”, in order to combine and use both in everyday life, if necessary, at will and personal characteristics.
    But the point is not that feminism wants to take away from men for women a piece of this “masculine” and all (that is, “so that women feminists are like men”). Feminism wants to remove negative emotional connotations from everything “feminine”, as well as unmotivated positive e. o. from “masculine”. So that a woman is not “ALSO a person”, but a person who is equal, but not identical, to a man. So that the “feminine” is not a reason for de facto condemnation in either a woman or a man.�

    In general, the habit of identifying some traits with a woman and others with a man is essentially just a stereotype, which only for a stupid person looks like an opportunity to prove the superiority of some over others.

    P.S. So … “Is it true that everyone who speaks out against racism actually wants to be white deep down, wants to be part of the dominant group?”

Leave a Reply

Categories