Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
Social evolution, as we have seen it so far, may well lead to a similar paradise co-existence for humanity. Today, cultural exchange between countries is becoming more and more profound, and peoples are beginning to understand each other. And in addition, there are a number of deterrent mechanisms that contribute to this: the double-edged sword of nuclear weapons, the diplomatic responsibility of countries for unleashing conflicts, the greater education of people who form a civil independent society, and the lack of benefits of seizing new territories (economic expansion is more profitable).
The ideal, of course, was the absence of potentially warring military organizations (like NATO), and the existence of closer cooperation of all major countries to quickly suppress all minor conflicts in developing countries.