Why do people who don't read or develop always find something to say?

By Category :

And achieve more in life than those who read and develop?

217 Answers

    Because success is first of all determination and energy. A quick mind can help. But knowledge sometimes leads to reflection or a dogmatic attitude to circumstances, and this is a road to nowhere. Tested over a long lifetime.

    It's not a question of whether a person reads or not. A person may not read, but watch video courses, for example, or he may have a large environment with which he can talk on duty. Thus, in the process of communication, a person receives information, processes it, and gives out something of their own. Reading books is not the only way to gain information and knowledge.

    And the fact that such people sometimes achieve more is not because they don't read. This is because they use the information they receive actively in their lives. And people who read a lot are mostly reserved people who accumulate knowledge in their heads. They make a lot of money, save it up, but don't use it in practice. The library person. There is a lot of knowledge, but just like the library, it stands still in peace.

    Because the one who does not spend time studying, learns to be cunning, notice little things and dodge. He knows how to negotiate with those who know everything. They will help him and let him write it off. These are the qualities that a successful businessman needs. That is why the Federal State Educational Standard was introduced in schools. But I do not agree that those who read and study are unsuccessful. Qualified and knowledgeable specialists are always at a premium.

    Because such people do not think, but feel – and this is more correct from the point of view of human development. The mind (intelligence) deprives the senses and the truth. It is fashionable here: to be active, travel, have a prestigious job, a beautiful house, a pumped-up figure, and go to the doctor to analyze your tests (often just like that). It is also fashionable for us to be smart, to know a lot even what is not necessary. Get carried away with something until you're blue in the face and think it's good for yourself and society. All this is far from spirituality, which in our time is not at all in fashion. People are now ruled by the spirit of materialism, to my great regret. And they have corresponding values.

    The author wants to beat faces for reading books on self-development. I am sure that you, the author, are a weakling and in life you will not answer a fly to an insult. I would advise you not to throw such big words around. After all, what measure you measure, this will be measured to you. If you want violence, you can wait. A provocateur.

    They have personal experience. They have a passion or love for some activity. And those who read live other people's lives. In fact, the only question is whose life do you live? Your own or someone else's. Those who achieve without exception live their lives in a high, or in happiness. You don't have time for someone else's life, believe me.

    ahahahph, why are reading and self-development related in this issue in this way?�

    kamon, in the yard of the 21st century. You can develop yourself in different ways. You don't have to read it. And reading doesn't necessarily lead to self-development. You can read different books. And I am sure that not all books will help you in self-development.

    In most cases, those who say they like to read are just showing off(based on my experience). although at the same time they can read all sorts of nonsense.�

    By the way, it is also very interesting why many people, mainly those who are so closely connected with reading no matter what and self-development, hate comics?( I don't really like comics, but still, for the sake of justice) Comics can also help in self-development. They often raise quite serious life problems, as well as problems of moral choice, problems of morality. Why can't it help your self-development?�

    Just like movies and cartoons. Yes, and the video on YT. Scientific articles. All this can help in self-development. The main thing is to be able to filter information.

    Because “don't read” is not equal to” don't develop”, and” read “is not equal to”develop”. Your cause-and-effect chain isn't quite right, so you can't even get the right answer.

    You can see a lot of examples in real life. A friend of my mother's read, I think, only at school and at the institute – and then only according to the program. But she actively communicated with people, learned about life in practice and experience, broke off several times, and what didn't kill her made her stronger. Now she has a big business. But many book lovers with unique theoretical knowledge remain theorists and then work for people like my mother's friend. Because they do not know how to deal with reality – there is no experience and a grated skin that would withstand stress and trials. And in books (as well as in the greenhouse-game conditions of trainings), all this is not worked out.

    Development is an ambiguous thing. If a person reads a lot, he develops as a reader and a carrier of knowledge on various topics. As an entrepreneur, he does not develop at the same time. But a person who is engaged in entrepreneurship develops as an entrepreneur.

    Because there are a lot of smart people who think that they are better than others because they read a lot or develop. And other people just act, fill bumps learn from their mistakes but act, they have no time to read go to courses they know what they need they have a goal, the goal is not to develop for the sake of development but for the sake of the result. Books, courses, and so on are theory, but you need practice.

    Life doesn't ask you what you know, it asks you what you can do. This means that in life, success is achieved by someone who has a large number of skills. I will say more, a person who knows how to collect bottles and recyclables on the street and knows where to turn them in, who knows how to quickly wash a car, will have more money than a person who is well-read and intellectually developed enough to understand Plato and Schopenhauer, but who is not able to wash the car correctly and quickly.

    Knowledge, most often, is a dead weight. Ask yourself: What do I know and what can I do? And the most important question is: do you know how to apply your knowledge to achieve practical results?

    Having knowledge, but not owning any practical craft, and dreaming of success is like trying to take off on a plane with one wing.

    Remember what one of the gentlemen of fortune, Kosoy, used to say: I have a friend who is also a scientist. He has a three-grade education. So he will draw a chervonets like that, you can't tell it from the real one.

    They pay you not for what you know (exceptions like Anatoly Wasserman are very rare), but for what you know how to do something useful. For example, glass the window, change the door or lock, repair the titanium, or repair the washing machine. Simple things, but they pay well for them.

    I'm not even talking about the ability to repair plumbing or the qualifications of a welder who can cook pipes of any diameter. This is generally a highly paid job.

    But from these simple skills, many have grown, albeit small, but their own business. Moreover, this is the type of business (repair of plumbing, household appliances, cars, apartment repairs, etc.) that practically does not require monetary investment. Only hands and tools. And professional knowledge of these things. But a person who is not looking for investments can develop a business based only with the help of personal skills.

    I wouldn't pay a dime to someone who's developed enough to talk to me about Kantian mechanics or world literature at my level. But I pay a lot of money to smart plumbers and welders who can't tell Homer from the Iliad.

    Skills such as: run three kilometers, bring a bath or 10 bags of potatoes to the ninth floor, mix a bucket of concrete mortar, change the floors in the apartment, much more valuable (in monetary terms), the ability to read a hundredweight of books.

    Reading SENSIBLE and WELL-WRITTEN books in the sense of self-development is: pleasure and relaxation, psychological dependence on spiritual food ,activation of mental activity and obtaining the necessary knowledge and answers to questions from someone else's life experience. This is communication with the author alone and insight into his understanding of the world. And this is serious, ” useful “and beneficial work for the entire human body.

    If we take material well-being and career as the criteria for success in life, I don't think that such people are healthier, more enthusiastic, and therefore happier. Therefore, I don't understand what they have achieved so “more in life”. What can be more expensive than physical and mental health and a sense of joy and happiness.

    The answer is very simple and lies on the surface; in particular, it concerns Russia quite strongly. The well-being of any society, country and people directly depends on who and how distributes wealth and resources among people. If a society is led by talented economists, real politicians, and real experts in their narrow fields, then the best job, the greatest resources for existence and development go to the largest possible number of literate and good people who strive for self-education. And if society and the distribution of benefits are led by those who only know about leadership that it looks like a” carrot and stick”, if there is no real policy, if the opinion of experts does not mean anything against the background of general noise and does not lead – then it is extremely rare for worthwhile, truly talented and gifted people to achieve something. Because all preferences and nepotism will be on the side of those who are similar to the last, uneducated, stagnant, unable to make a sober, objective assessment. In a different society, a society of pure reason and professionalism, unfair success would be as rare as the actual lifetime evaluation of a genius (who mostly lose their patents, live in poverty, and are exploited. Guess for yourself by whom. Not more talented and educated, that's for sure). The point is this. In the internal architecture of how society is built, and who leads it, what guides it, what drives it.

    It seems to me that the question is not quite correctly posed. The author most likely meant the following: “why can people with a lot of knowledge doubt their opinion, but people with limited horizons speak confidently and believe that their opinion is the ultimate truth?”
    And the answer to this question is quite simple. A smart person knows that an opinion can be refuted by other arguments and is able to change it under the pressure of arguments (as, most likely, he has done more than once in his life).
    And for a not-quite-smart person, confidence in their knowledge borders on blind faith and, perhaps, superstition, let's call it that.

    Because books are different.I've devoured a lot of literature in my life,but it was either the school curriculum (which disappeared immediately after writing an essay, presenting / answering a literature lesson), or entertainment literature (science fiction,fantasy,westerns, etc.), and I can't say that I learned a lot of useful and clever thoughts from what I read.Such people who shout about self-development through reading, read everything in a row, just to read, put it on display and pretentiously declare that they are developing, and others (who gain their experience through trial and error, fill their bumps and develop through action)- cattle.By reading tons of books, you learn to borrow other people's thoughts and use them on your own behalf.Much more valuable is what you came up with and what you came up with yourself.

    Tell this to Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Larry Page, Sergey Brin, etc.

    The reason why this question seems relevant is that you consider “success” and examples of “success” within the framework of our national culture. The culture, I must say, is quite primitive and sometimes even archaic.

    Indeed, in Russia, reading a large amount of theoretical literature can lead to little within the framework of the domestic understanding of “success”. Well, except for the theoretical areas.

    And this is normal.

    In the same way, studying the literature on nuclear physics is unlikely to allow an aboriginal from South Africa to achieve absolute success in his native village – a new cow, a couple of bags of corn and fresh clay for the walls of the hut.

    But if you ask, for example, who manages the same native at the state level, or manages mines where an aboriginal for$ 2 a month extracts diamonds for export – you will definitely hear about a good education at the level of Oxford or Cambridge.

    And this is also normal. Therefore, I would not be so categorical in this statement!

    Why do people who do not read and do not develop in any way always find something to answer and achieve more in life than those who develop and read?

    The obvious answer is: because they don't bother. 🙂 They do not reflect, do not think about the fate of the world and others.

    Because, as Charles Bukowski said, ” The trouble with this world is that smart people are full of doubt, and stupid people are full of confidence.” And we face this every day and everywhere.

Leave a Reply

Categories