Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
I would have supported him, not let him fall.
This would have dealt a serious blow to the worldview of an old man who professed to be merciless to any weakness, not forgiving it for himself. That's why I put myself in a mental hospital, and then in the grave.�
He would, of course, scold me with the last words instead of gratitude, shouting “You should have let me fall!!!” and run away in anger. But, you see, having cooled down, and would think about the fact that pushing a falling person is not the only possible course of events in the universe, that mercy is higher than justice,and would make some adjustments to your understanding of overcoming “human, too human”. It might have saved his life and sanity, too )
Let's give the floor to Nietzsche himself:
You laugh, it's Nietzsche. A global celebrity, icon. One selfie with him would be worth a fortune. Besides, one of the brightest minds of mankind. After the test of connection with Nazism, through which his name has successfully passed (and in today's world this is almost impossible), he will never fall again. And he will lift up anyone who comes near him. So not only would I help you not to fall, but I would also give you a hat that fell off and do everything to make friends.
I don't think that Nietzsche understood “falling” in the literal sense, as here they understand in the comments. Of course, if he had started to fall on the slippery sidewalk, I would not have pushed him, on the contrary, I would have supported him. Let's take for example another “falling”, a hereditary alcoholic, who swears that he is not an alcoholic, but “just like that”. It is not a sin to push such a person or at least not to support them, as those who are too compassionate do.
Nietzsche is often misunderstood because of his inspiration for Hitler.. In the comments, an excerpt from some of his texts about the fallen man.. The eye still wants to catch on to just one word: “I went on indifferently,” but Nietzsche did not promote indifference.. an indifferent person wouldn't help this person.. he only said that you should not take other people's troubles close to your soul, and you can go crazy, because sometimes in order to go crazy, it is enough to have your own problems.. Read Nietzsche's quotes (and enter them in the search engine, so that you don't have too much water).. learn a lot of new and unexpected things about it.. Yes, he spoke directly, without covering the rotting wounds of society with a fig leaf, but he did not preach rot.. he tried to instruct humanity in a slightly different way than religions and politics did (which failed to do so).. even eugenics has some truth to it.. if, having a high consciousness, all carriers of genetic predispositions to diseases refused to leave offspring, after several generations, many diseases would simply disappear like a nightmare.. that is, the suffering and dying would cease to be born in humanity.. but no one would want to be born dying right away.. at the same time, no one would feel bad about it.. in the presence of high consciousness, childless heroes who decided to save humanity from broken genes would have rights to servants (who would be well paid.. and the heroes themselves would also be paid, about the same as they are paid to volunteers in hot spots of military operations).. in my opinion, the rejection of offspring is much more harmless than rushing to the front line and wondering if they will be killed or not and when exactly and in what way … . If you want to see the real evil-study the values of society of the majority of modern teenagers who live under the motto “all pokh. y” .. and this fiercely propagandized and imposed indifference is only the tip of the iceberg (I personally broke one head (the second ran away) when I saw how they tried to pierce a yard cat with a piece of iron and filmed on the phone).. here it is, evil.. and not in old philosophical works, which, if you want, you can not read.. and Hitler.. so remember the Crusades.. Christianity teaches “love your neighbor as yourself”, and the crusaders, allegedly inspired by Christianity, killed anyone who did not want to accept their faith.. it's the same here.. there is always a moron who manages to twist the good and be inspired by it for evil..
The question to answer seems to be not difficult, but on the other hand, if you follow the rules and ideology of Buddhism, then there is no point in interfering in what is happening. And I think it's right that you don't need to push anyone. I would not touch it, let everything go as it should happen. With respect.
Do you know that Nietzsche went crazy, seeing how to beat a tied horse..? From what life is born this or that philosophy..? Quotes taken out of context kill everything.. Nietzsche is one of those whom quotations have reduced to incomprehension..
Seeing a falling volume of Nietzsche, like anyone else, I would not push, because this physical experience over the book will not give me anything. It is the same with Nietzsche's falling old man, as with any other. It makes sense to do something that will bring benefits, and there is no point in making useless movements.
What do you think about malicious actions? Isn't the pleasure of committing a crime enough incentive for “someone”?
And to this I will answer: “See point 1.” If someone is happy with villainy, it means that it benefits them, even if only in a ghostly way. To commit villainy without reward and with the risk of losing your head is below bestiality.
Push is allegorical, and why is quite significant…
To push Nietzsche means,
Study Nietzsche's work.
Measure in your understanding with the previously studied knowledge of the evolution of the spirit (unknown) and the achievement of civilization itself (intelligent technologies of artificial intelligence).
Make your own opinion about Nietzsche's work according to all the rules of scientific thought…
The second part of the question draws attention to itself
pushing and tacitly prompts:
The first is also the last,
Learning, Learning, and still Learning.
There can be no falling Nietzsche a priori, just as there can be no falling Lomonosov – these are pioneers both in the development of thought and its application.
Pushing all the others because: To judge to row not to turn bags. Folk wisdom.
No, I would not push Nietzsche because in my philosophy of life I am not guided by the so-called Nietzschean principle of “falling push”, I have other views on life, with all due respect to the famous philosopher.