2 Answers

  1. No matter how paradoxical it may seem, man constantly violates the law of causality: by the very fact of his existence as a human being, and not just a “two-legged creature without feathers” (according to Pseudo-Plato). As Kant used to say, man is a citizen of two worlds: the world of natural necessity and the world of spiritual freedom. It is freedom that falls out of any causal series, out of natural determinism. Every human thought, as such, is a “creation-out-of-nothing”, and in this respect man is indelibly like God… Hence the responsibility. Maybe even like this:

    Before the fate of “wanting” and “doing” –

    There are no differences.

    We can't split it within its limits

    A single footprint.

    The shadow of a thought even that for a moment

    I came to see you,

    Changes the same ratio

    Good and evil.

    Don't let it be a hindrance to you

    To the creators of grievances

    Let the stars enjoy other people's success

    Showed your kind –

    If anger and envy in the soul of sarcastic

    More painful than arrows,

    That is, the sensitive ovary is equal in strength

    Decoupling cases.

    Although you didn't take it as a path to victory,

    No poison, no lies,

    And even in the dump you don't know

    Brass knuckles or knife,

    You may never have marked with lead

    Pour out your fervor,

    But I was glad someone was dead,

    Then you killed him.

    Even if you didn't slander me cruelly yourself,

    Not humiliated,

    In everyday squabbles no less than others

    Suffered from stings,

    Did not make pain, did not send separation,

    Did not cause crying,

    But I was satisfied with someone else's flour,

    Then you're the executioner.

    Let him not try to steal it

    Someone else's luggage,

    I didn't seek my own rules

    Dictate it,

    But if you don't mind dreaming about it

    Since some time ago –

    You're exactly the same in this abyss

    Both a cad and a thief.

    Not once did he call, even if it was quiet,

    People there,

    Where as the infection of a sudden dashing

    Trouble awaited –

    But if you echoed with your heart earlier

    To that path,

    Then in this grief, like those who called,

    You're guilty.

    Kohl knew that someone was burning with eagerness

    Dispel the darkness,

    But it's just like conceit,

    Imputed to him,

    And himself in the midst of a false hubbub

    I didn't answer, –

    That means you lied, too,

    Not silent.

    The depths of the world, the depths of the soul,

    They are one.

    Something to choose by half

    Not given here.

    For the fury of battle and the timid sigh

    One answer.

    Before the fate of “wanting” and “doing” –

    There are no differences.

  2. I don't agree with Yuri. No human thought is “created out of nothing.” On the contrary, any of the niches is conditioned by something, something necessarily preceded its appearance in the head. Even the ones that seem to be personally yours, and don't look like anything else.�

    Buddhists have developed the concept of karma as causal relationships very well. Even if you are suddenly the first innovator in the village, a universally recognized genius, whose work has no analogues in time, even close, it is all a consequence of your previous achievements, which come back to you in such a form, as if sprouting from the seeds of certain actions on the endless macaroni of karma.

    According to the masters, one can transcend causality by becoming enlightened, disidentifying oneself with the mind / body complex. But in these realms there is no place for actions or thoughts, because you dissolve into zero, or become everything, so causality will not be violated again.

    So as long as you think of yourself as a mind/body, you can't break causality. As soon as you stop considering yourself one, there will be no one to break it.

    In short, oh.

Leave a Reply

Categories