Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
Your answers should contain fewer facts, links to reliable sources, and logic. It is advisable to immediately start making offensive statements, promoting pseudoscience, or, for example, praising Stalin or Hitler. And at the same time, do not stray from the intended course, do not write answers to those questions in which you can give a normal, emotionally unpolished answer without propaganda. If you write once about a pipette of pus in a liter of milk or what you like about the United Russia party, and then write about something else, then you will get a few disadvantages, and that will be the end of it. Therefore, you need to choose your role, always write the same thing and not listen to others.
Express an opinion that is different from the liberal, materialistic, atheistic, etc., etc. that are so popular among young people today. Given that the vast majority of users of The Question are young people, then to catch the cons, write something like “faith in God is good” or “scientific progress is not as good as”it is painted”.
Oh, I somehow massively zaminusovali for the answer about the fact that tattoos are cool =)
Try. You can still discuss Russia and Ukraine at Eurovision, although success is not guaranteed
It is offensive, politically incorrect, and so on to answer the questions asked.�
Since questions are mostly evaluated by ordinary people, it's easy to hurt their feelings, offend them.�
However, I think that this threatens to ban.