Let's say that your loved one has committed a murder. Would you turn him in to the police if you found out about this? If the answer is no (failed-a), then after how many corpses will it be yes?

By Category :

9 Answers

  1. No, I wouldn't have passed. And by the way, the right not to testify against relatives is enshrined in the Constitution. But if I thought that the murder he committed was illegal (for example, not committed in self-defense), then we would most likely break up as a result of this act.

  2. Of course I wouldn't have passed. I would have helped her commit murder. And then why do you need a family if you don't help your partner? Otherwise, it's not a family. It doesn't matter how many corpses there are. Even the whole world. The main thing is that she stayed and I :))))))) This is true Love and family. When one for all and all for odngogo. And I don't accept and don't know any other family. The wife must be so faithful to her husband that she will burn in hell with him, and the husband must also be faithful to his wife. Otherwise, marriage doesn't make sense.

  3. It all depends on the circumstances. If it was intentional and a normal person who didn't do anything to her, her family, or anyone else, then yes.

    If it's careless , well, no one is safe, and the victim won't get any better. Perhaps I would break up with her, depending on the case (if there was some negligence, etc., I would not be comfortable living with such a person)

    If this is some kind of bastard, whether it was someone who deliberately put her in serious danger, brutally betrayed her, attacked her, or bad parents/relatives who seriously damaged the person's psyche (or not only it), in general, someone who committed a significant act of violence against her-then everything would be done to prevent her from being taken, and then kissed and patted on the head

    Moralphagi, your way out

  4. it is assumed that my favorite person does not cut people right and left just like that)))))

    so that… it all depends on the reason.

    If she's just crazy , then I want to live too. Love is love, and I don't want to wake up (not wake up) with my throat cut.

    It's probably weird, but I don't really care about murder as such. people are constantly killing their own kind. somehow strangely surprised and pretend that this does not happen)

  5. Yeah, the hypocrite society. From all sides there are shouts and groans, saying that the country's laws do not apply. They say we need to change the government, as soon as we change the government, the laws will immediately “act” and begin. And how can they begin to act, if people are not even ready to hand over their own people for murder!!!. Only one friend wrote that he would pass. So then, after all, he “made excuses” a lot, explained to people why he was like Herod, handed over a loved one for murder.�

    If the people are not ready to give up for murder, then what about theft and corruption to talk and talk about. So maybe it's not just a matter of “power”, maybe you need to go to the mirror yourself

  6. But this will show the investigation. Your own name. If I think that the person is right, then help will be provided. If not , we will resolve the issue. And extradition to the authorities is not the worst thing…

  7. I'd like to find out the circumstances of the crime first. Why, why killed, etc. It could have been, for example, an unintentional murder, then of course I would not have passed. If the murder was premeditated, then I would have made a decision after finding out the circumstances. I will inform the police if the murder was committed with extreme cruelty or if the victim was a child. And of course, if we are talking about serial murders.

  8. The answer depends on the circumstances. Namely (in descending order of priority):

    1. will failure to report cause undue damage to third parties, and what kind of damage, and is there a risk of repetition?
    2. what are the specific circumstances and motives of the murder, and are they immoral in my eyes?
    3. the level of trust in the law enforcement system and the courts, the proportionality and justice of the expected punishment of the killer (for example, in Germany and in the Russian Federation, the answers in some cases may differ)
      Love is unlikely to affect and will probably soon fade away if the murder is committed under circumstances that do not justify such an act in my eyes.�

    For example, if there is a real danger, I do not consider it reprehensible to “exceed the necessary self-defense”. On the contrary, I condemn the state's desire to limit the right to protect itself and others from the aggressor.�

    And I condemn any premeditated murder for selfish reasons and will report it to almost any sane state.

  9. As for me – funny.
    A person who was able to commit the murder of his own kind is mentally unstable – this has long been known.(There are facts here) Человек A person is not inclined to kill their own kind(and in the animal world this is rare, only in certain cases, for example, the struggle for food(intraspecific struggle)), but also lives in a civilized society.
    I would have reported it to the police, of course.
    P.S
    Who needs a free-roaming maniac?
    � � � � � � � � I, of course, understand love is a carrot, but you need to think ahead.
    � � � � � � � � � � � � Yes, in addition, this is Article 316 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

Leave a Reply

Categories