One Answer

  1. I'll answer a little from an unexpected angle. I understand that the answer is not quite about that, but maybe it will clarify something in basic human psychology on this topic.

    And so. The rest of the animals don't really have a concept of nudity. Even the closest relatives of a person with this somehow do not have this question. Also, children under the age of five also do not really understand this concept, but this concept exists in all cultures (or at least in the vast majority), which hints at the biological (read: instinctive), and not just the socio-cultural background of the phenomenon itself.

    Since the attitude to nudity in ancient societies is quite problematic to study directly, it is worth starting from the question of why our ancestors began to hide it in the first place? The question is clearly not about sexuality (well, not only in it), because some types of clothing, formally covering sexual characteristics, can be even more ” sexy “than the most that neither is nudity, and nudity when it is around, very quickly loses its sexual component.

    But here you can look at our closest relatives, and notice that the demonstration of genitals is quite an indicator of aggression and dominance. So is the display of fangs. But if we can't unearth behavioral patterns, then we can unearth fangs, and I think it won't be a surprise to learn that fangs in the ancestors of humans were steadily decreasing, from which we can conclude that our ancestors followed the path of reducing intra-group aggression, to cooperation.

    That is, according to some hypotheses, the very concept of nudity and the need to hide it arose among our ancestors in order not to provoke conflicts within the group, demonstrating inappropriate dominance. This also explains quite well why so many men have a complex because of the size of their penis, without having any objective reasons for it. Why men's penises have not shrunk like fangs is a topic for a separate conversation.

Leave a Reply