Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
I believe that this reflects the hypocrisy of society. Mice are people, a cat is a nuisance of any degree of severity. And when one of the mice fails, the others don't think it's necessary to help it, or at least help themselves to escape from the cat, because it's obvious that they will be next. And this is not to mention the fact that they could think about solving the problem. But to inflate the scandal in the information sphere out of it and cut down a fatter fee for the sensation – yes, that's fine.
Also noteworthy is the very image of mice – a cowardly people, dissatisfied with the situation, but doing nothing.
And you can also be politicized and say about the same thing with the caveat that the cat is the authorities. But we won't do that, of course.
the picture is not very clear, but if I'm not mistaken, it shows the fight of mice against a cat. In the philosophical sense, this may mean that mice see the root of their problems in cats, that is, it is in cats that the root of ontological evil is laid, whereas in fact the root of their main evil is that they are mice, in their nature. You need to change yourself first of all, and not fight against external evil