2 Answers
Leave a Reply
You must Register - Login to add an answer.
Login – Register
Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
The right to life is a natural right. This case was first mentioned in the US Declaration of Independence in the 18th century. Since then, the right to life has been enshrined in many other international conventions that are also in force in Russia.
Of course, there is an exception to any rule. Any right and freedom is valid as long as it does not violate the right and freedom of another person. Therefore, in many countries, the death penalty remains.
How do you interpret the right to life?
In civilized countries, they arrive (not immediately!) to the fact that everyone has the right not to be killed, if he does not hold a weapon in his hands. Moreover, if possible, an armed man has the right to drop his weapon – so that he will not be killed.
Agree that even such a civilized interpretation is very limited.
Next, civilized countries (again-not immediately!) they come to the conclusion that everyone has the right not to die of hunger and from the lack of publicly available (and not rare and super-expensive) medical care. And this interpretation is limited.
Please note that a person is also required to help at least a little, or at least not interfere with the observance of their rights.