![](/wp-content/uploads/default_attachments/2022/02/3390565671583.jpg)
Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
There is also experimental cognition. It's called science. Real scientists conduct experiments, and if several scientists get the same result when repeating the experiment, then it is considered that the experiment is objective and proves the phenomenon under study. For example, several people throw objects. All objects fall to the ground. With the help of this experiment, it was found that if the object is deprived of its support, it will fall to the ground. And it doesn't depend on who throws the item.
There is no logic or units of measurement in nature, this is purely human fiction. So our mind is a discrete illusion in an analog world. Understanding the world with our imperfect brain will be equivalent to trying to comprehend a fractal picture. We will learn the patterns and formulas, but we will not understand the meaning of it.
First, I will note that you will not know the world from an authoritative source, but you will know the “authoritative source” (the information in it). In this way, we acquire “information about knowledge” rather than knowledge itself, which often becomes our beliefs (often false).
…
All methods are good if they lead to a reliable knowledge of the real world, and not to ignorance (thinking that you know when you don't know it as you should know it in order to successfully implement it in life).