![](/wp-content/uploads/default_attachments/2022/02/9090989966142.jpg)
Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
In my opinion, when we say “the concept of law”, we assume that “law” and our “concept” of it exist independently of each other. When we say “the concept of law”, we involuntarily mean that “law” does not exist without our concept of it.
That is, the “concept of law” is more typical of the language of classical modernist science, based on the belief in a world in which subject and object are clearly separated. The “concept of law” is more characteristic of modern postmodern science, in which there is no clear distinction between subject and object.