Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
The worldview can be called a part of consciousness, because they exist and “function” together. All our ideas, experiences, concepts, and knowledge about everything — about the world-are represented in consciousness. And the worldview in accordance with its rationalistic nature, principles, principles, ideas — structures (forms) It is the content of consciousness (A. Schweitzer: “The worldview is the germ of all ideas…”, and it is, as the philosopher emphasizes, “born of thinking”) in such a way (and with the purpose) that consciousness represents reality as it exists in itself, that is, as it is created by thinking. objectively and truly. This is necessary in order to approach everything (real), so to speak — sanely, rationally, i.e. adequately. This is how it “works” in consciousness.
Consequently, the goal of a worldview is knowledge and truth about the real (world).
The worldview, therefore, is a formed system (representations, views) by means of the same ideas, principles (and, of course, rationalistic ones) through which (consciousness, thinking)will be determined in the final plan as something that exists from the standpoint of knowledge, i.e. really. Thus, popularly speaking, a certain “form” of vision is developed, through which this or that is considered. That doesn't mean it's true, of course, but it does represent the intent… and the purpose that it certainly has.
It should not be said that the worldview is unchangeable. Of course not. In the course of knowledge and life, a person's worldview undergoes gradual changes. So everything that is established (at this point in time) is somehow recorded (in the worldview)-until new explanations and clarifications that occur constantly, and fundamental ones — less often.
And, to put it definitely, a worldview is the result of the work of reason on the content of consciousness, or so to put it with an “analytical” and ideological aim.
It should also be noted that an important feature of the worldview is that what is presented in it acts (for it at the moment of time) as real (so it usually understands itself). As the philosopher A. Schweitzer writes: “Only what is refracted in the thinking of many people and at the same time perceived as truth.” So the person trusts him. How can you not trust them? After all, it is a certain result of the same cognitions that aim to reflect and represent reality and the world with all their (non — corporeal) means of the soul and consciousness, as if it (already represented by this ideological essence) is itself this efficacy and speaks both for itself and for itself (i.e., <as if> on behalf of this reality itself). And it is clear that it will be closest to that (real) only when it is again presented in the form of knowledge, by means of knowledge, and more systematically and more objectively-only by science and sciences, and nothing more. In this regard, we can say that a true worldview is mainly derived from knowledge and knowledge, sciences and sciences.
In this connection, it is worth dwelling on how the worldview functions in the system of consciousness. If, for example, it is necessary to make a decision, establish goal-setting, etc., then consciousness turns to its worldview sphere both on the basis of it (since again everything basic and fundamental is recorded in the final form in the worldview) and on the basis of it (so to speak, “consulting” it, consulting, conforming…) and takes due, i.e. verified (on) this or that <its, presumably, rationalistic> decision.
Therefore, the current picture of the worldview is the most important condition and basis from which a particular choice of human actions is made. The philosopher (A. Schweitzer) emphasizes that after all, because of the ideas and established beliefs that exist in it, “the way of actions of the individual and society” is determined, and in general, as Sigmund Freud (an Austrian scientist) puts it, a worldview is “an intellectual construct that uniformly solves all the problems of our being.”
Of course, each person <naturally> has his own<naturally> < individual> worldview, which has developed in the course of his life path. And it's like there's nothing out of the ordinary. In this connection, it is worth drawing our attention (also) to this: if the form of a worldview is related to reality and the world (being), because it shows (or tries to show) in its whole way what the world is, or what it is, etc., then all these (from the side of the worldview and the person) will determine accordingly (that) and the relation to both the individual and the many — and the world (as a whole).
The ancient Greek philosopher Sextus Empiricus has the following idea: “If they call a worldview a mode of reasoning that follows a certain position in accordance only with the phenomenon, then we will say that we have a worldview; in view of the fact that this position shows us how, apparently, we should live correctly (we understand”correctly” not only in accordance with virtue, but more unlimited), having in mind the possibility of abstinence” (in short: “Relying on it, you can safely feel yourself in life, know what you should strive for, how best to dispose of your affects and interests”-Sigmund Freud). On the contrary: “For society, as for the individual, life without a worldview is a pathological violation of the highest sense of orientation” (A. Schweitzer).
In fact, one can say of the worldview that it is <in a certain respect> the support or, say, (even) the basis for consciousness, in which it forms with it a common<in a certain respect> < rationalistic>system of the human soul (as Thomas Aquinas justly reminds <us> of the rationalistic system, since “human souls belong to the genus of mental substances”) and of man<to us> < as > a rational being.
I will describe my vision, what is the worldview and my attitude to this phenomenon. I believe that the worldview is the core of a reasonable person, like the spine of the human body. The formation of a person's worldview is laid in the family on a subconscious level. A person sees the attitude of their parents and relatives, their actions, and imitates them. The worldview is not a constant, but a variable phenomenon that changes depending on knowledge, improvement and age. Just as cartilage becomes bone with age, so the worldview changes with the experience of a person's life. And only at the end of his life can a person answer the question about his worldview, and only if he has lived at least 65-118 years. I write this for myself and don't try to teach anyone or follow my Path. With respect.
This is the simplest question from the point of view of a philosophical definition of what a worldview is. Browser-command line – “worldview”.
For most people, the word worldview doesn't mean much in particular.
Namely, it is the alpha and omega on the path of human development as a rational and spiritual being.
If you are a truly devout Christian, then by definition you must have a religious worldview. That is, you see the world through the eyes of a teaching that you believe and believe to be true.
However, there are those who believe that there is no religion higher than the truth. The development of this worldview is based, in particular, on independent thinking, lack of authority, ability to analyze, synthesize, own experience and critically revised experience of others, etc.
The truth frees a person from suffering. Therefore, the search for it is a search for oneself in the universe.
Who are you, where did you come from, and where are you going? This triune question is the quintessence of any worldview.
The worldview is based on the worldview. Worldview is a natural worldview based on a biopsychic substrate. In the course of life, this basis is reinforced or deformed by living conditions, develops within certain boundaries of the natural worldview.
Worldview – a holistic attitude to the world and people.
There is no philosophical point of view, there are opinions of individual philosophers, just as specific people.
This is the point from which a philosopher,or not so much, looks at the world,in other words, a vision of the world.The cylinder,from different points of view, looks different,and the ball may appear to be a circle.Unfortunately, few people do not look from the point of view,but try to see holistically.To do this, you need to learn wisdom.Seeing the world without God, without teaching His will,without knowing God, is a very short-sighted vision.God resists the proud,so there are many gifted people with outstanding mental abilities who completely do not recognize the possibility of the existence of God.If a blind person does not see the sun, it does not mean that there is no sun,because many people see it.A lot of people are believers,and to recognize them as imbeciles is an extreme degree of savagery.Who wants to, looks for ways, who doesn't want to,looks for reasons.