One Answer
Leave a Reply
You must Register - Login to add an answer.
Login – Register
Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
The answer to the question lies in itself. Ontology in a broad sense is a branch of philosophy, the science of being as such, skepticism is a method of cognition based on doubt, critical attitude to the object and subject. We put it together and get a critical attitude to being, a doubt about the existence of everything that exists.
If we speculate a little, we get a rather shaky position, because if the subject doubts the existence of everything that exists, then he must include himself in this set, since he is part of everything that exists, and in this case his position loses all meaning, since a vicious circle is created, but if he doubts the existence of everything that exists, but does not doubt the existence of – solipsism, and in this case, the subject, firstly, ceases to be a skeptic, since he accepts his existence as an axiom, and secondly, this position puts the subject on the same level with religious believers who accept obviously unfalsifiable and unprovable entities as truth.