Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
It is impossible, we evaluate actions and phenomena based on past experience, experience is unique, so the opinion/point of view is unique.
Therefore, by objectivity, we mean rather a view of resetting the point of view of conventional norms accepted in society, myths about the right.
Hello.
I think there is an objective truth, but a person can only approach it based on his conditions and experience.
Approximation to the truth occurs according to laws close to dialectical. Dialectics describes the comprehension of truth quite accurately. Dialectics itself, like formal logic, is very close to the truth, but it cannot exactly coincide with it.
Each person has his own subjective objectivity, which in any case is presented through the prism of his worldview and many other factors that influence his opinion. But personally, in my opinion, through a high level of compassion and the ability to analyze the causes and consequences of other people's motivations (in other words, putting yourself in someone else's place, trying to understand why they might have done something, even if it goes against your opinions), you can be closer to objectivity. Having an understanding of all sides and opinions, you can make your subjective position more clear and reasoned.
Probably from the point of view of philosophy, this is not entirely scientific, but I try to act like this)