Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
It all depends on the mood in society and traditions. In my opinion, the depiction of violence in Russian art has declined. I'm tired of it. The French have never been particularly violent. For Americans, this is a permanent state, fueled by public sentiment. It looks like they've finished playing.
Everyone is initially interested in violence. Purely for utilitarian reasons:
And the main question:
Kill Bill films – where did the authors cross the border here? Or didn't you click through? Everyone decides for themselves.
Apparently, the question refers to borderline or even pathological violence.
The answer is something like this:
If a person (s) has been addicted to borderline or pathological violence in art for too long, then we can talk about such a problem as masochism, which can become a stable addiction.
And such a person can live all his life causing himself pain and getting some kind of pathological satisfaction from it. The prognosis of this dependence is uncertain.
As with alcoholism and smoking. It depends on the body's resource. Some quit at the age of 30, others drink to death.