Hamlet's question ” To be or not to be?” it is quite common, no matter how surprising it may seem at first glance.
An illusion can disguise a problem as something else, or it can lead you into the impenetrable thickets of confused assumptions and hopes. But to understand a person who is nearby, you still need a real view and reactions to adequate situations.
We endure to the last, bringing it to an explosive point, after which no illusions will save us. And the world will appear in all its calmness and ambiguity.
If you look at it from the point of view of immersion, then seeming is a superficial worldview, it will be like imitating. An example of such behavior in literature is the behavior of Sitnikov and Kukshina from “Fathers and Sons”, they only seemed nihilists, because these trends were new and fashionable in their own way, but at the same time there were almost no nihilist views inside them, they did not live by it, but only imitated real nihilists, like Bazarov.
To be is to carry an idea, something that you live by, something that is to some extent your core and influences your worldview. In solving some issues, everything should be passed through the prism of this perception of the world, there should be very few situations in which you will deviate from your ideals, and for this you need a serious reason.
If you combine this into a single sentence, then you can say that seeming is all just a small part of “being” that will collapse at the first difficulties from the chosen path, and being is a fully accepted point of view that a person will adhere to for a long time until something changes it.
In my opinion,we need to go deeper, and not rush from extreme to extreme. Therefore, the effect “to be, not to appear.” It is worth noting such a person as Oleg Voevodin, litechtenie and (the term) square tragus.
Andrey, everything is simple: to appear is to play a role, to be is to show inner qualities. I think sometimes “seem” can go into the category of “be” when the social mask sticks too much. “To be” allows you to develop naturally, without strain, but with “seem” just difficulties arise.�
For example, a person really wants to appear wealthy, buys status items, surrounds himself with status people, but he has not yet grown up or has not grown up to this, worries, and earns neuroses.�
I see it this way. Criterion – naturalness/unnaturalness.
To realize yourself and act. Do not be like sofa Warriors: in words Leo Tolstoy with commas, but in fact infusoria slipper.
Take actions that will change who you want to be and appear to be. Self-development and realize yourself as an individual, be less of an asshole and rely only on yourself, be independent, but you can not refuse the help of your loved ones. And find the motivation that will make a good push for the promotion of your idea (the implementation of your plans). Set a goal that is less than 8B / 36B / 8@t.
Hamlet's question ” To be or not to be?” it is quite common, no matter how surprising it may seem at first glance.
An illusion can disguise a problem as something else, or it can lead you into the impenetrable thickets of confused assumptions and hopes. But to understand a person who is nearby, you still need a real view and reactions to adequate situations.
We endure to the last, bringing it to an explosive point, after which no illusions will save us. And the world will appear in all its calmness and ambiguity.
Read more in my post: “To be or to seem”
If you look at it from the point of view of immersion, then seeming is a superficial worldview, it will be like imitating. An example of such behavior in literature is the behavior of Sitnikov and Kukshina from “Fathers and Sons”, they only seemed nihilists, because these trends were new and fashionable in their own way, but at the same time there were almost no nihilist views inside them, they did not live by it, but only imitated real nihilists, like Bazarov.
To be is to carry an idea, something that you live by, something that is to some extent your core and influences your worldview. In solving some issues, everything should be passed through the prism of this perception of the world, there should be very few situations in which you will deviate from your ideals, and for this you need a serious reason.
If you combine this into a single sentence, then you can say that seeming is all just a small part of “being” that will collapse at the first difficulties from the chosen path, and being is a fully accepted point of view that a person will adhere to for a long time until something changes it.
In my opinion,we need to go deeper, and not rush from extreme to extreme.
Therefore, the effect “to be, not to appear.”
It is worth noting such a person as Oleg Voevodin, litechtenie and (the term) square tragus.
Andrey, everything is simple: to appear is to play a role, to be is to show inner qualities. I think sometimes “seem” can go into the category of “be” when the social mask sticks too much. “To be” allows you to develop naturally, without strain, but with “seem” just difficulties arise.�
For example, a person really wants to appear wealthy, buys status items, surrounds himself with status people, but he has not yet grown up or has not grown up to this, worries, and earns neuroses.�
I see it this way. Criterion – naturalness/unnaturalness.
To realize yourself and act. Do not be like sofa Warriors: in words Leo Tolstoy with commas, but in fact infusoria slipper.
Take actions that will change who you want to be and appear to be. Self-development and realize yourself as an individual, be less of an asshole and rely only on yourself, be independent, but you can not refuse the help of your loved ones. And find the motivation that will make a good push for the promotion of your idea (the implementation of your plans). Set a goal that is less than 8B / 36B / 8@t.