Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
In our world, non-subjective is “our world” as OURS, i.e., not belonging (not produced, not reproduced by consciousness) to one single subject, individual, social, or transcendental. “Our” (not “mine”) it appears as a product of the interaction of different and different subjects about objects that do not coincide with them (other people, things, relationships, etc.). So in the case of a real question, a certain whole of the situation (the model of “our world”) is formed because there is a relationship between the questioner and the answerer about the content of the question and this relationship is confirmed by the reader, who both certifies this established whole (relation) and develops (changes) it with his understanding of the question. Not everything and not always in this model is completely objective, but it is not subjective either.
We're all going to die. And this is objective.
There is also a high-objective sun in the sky.
And if you think about it a little, there are a lot of non-subjective objects and processes.
And even in psychology.
And this is how you want it.
You can be a realist ( ru.wikipedia.org ) and consider that there is some objective reality that lies beyond the limits of human consciousness. Or you can be a solipsist and believe that everything that happens around you is just a derivative of consciousness, and there is no objective reality at all. I answered the question about solipsism in more detail here:�thequestion.ru
All these worldviews have a right to exist, and you can freely identify yourself as a follower of a particular doctrine. There is no concrete proof of the validity or failure of a particular philosophy, we still know too little about the reality around us and our own consciousness. You can believe in what you like best.