Sorry for the untidiness of the text and some lack of agreement. I started writing this one quite a long time ago, I wanted to look at this issue from different sides (philosophical, scientific, socio-cultural), and with long periods of time when I wrote part of the text somewhere I lost (perhaps because of a virus), and now I realized that I had already completely dropped the connecting thread and now I realized that if I didn't post it at least in this form, � �

….Starting to study, to assert in the name of science what is ethical and what is not, but it is precisely from the postulates of science that this cannot be deduced in any way… .
Or will it pass into other forms of matter and energy, but will it be at any of the stages of decay, a particle that will not be able to further divide into its component parts ? Will not contain any component parts, and will not in turn be included as part of something larger? Won't interact with the environment or other particles? Well, suppose the existence of such a particle is in principle impossible and matter can divide indefinitely, wouldn't this also mean for us that death as we imagine it (as absolute non-existence) is in principle impossible for us?
(the question of the existence of the so-called “soul” is actually a question of whether matter is capable of dividing indefinitely, it is a question of whether the divisibility of matter is infinite, because “nothing comes out of nowhere and does not go anywhere” (although quantum physics could still argue with this, all these dubious oppositions of “true and false vacuum”, but I will not go into such details now) because every atom of your body, every molecule of your body, just as it was not taken from before “out of nowhere” (I do not touch on the so-called “out of nowhere” now)., the”big Bang”, although it is also one of the intractable questions that also need to answer that would finally understand what will happen after your death, not with the body with him, and so clear was happening and the natives living in the Amazon jungle, and uncontacted and chartered scientist from prestigious European University, they only describe different this phenomenon – these will be completely different descriptive models, and no, I don't want to say that they are absolutely equivalent (maybe only from the point of view of a sociolinguist), the scientific model is much more prolific, no matter how beautiful and complex the language is spoken by an Indian from the lower reaches of the Amazon river, especially if it is confirmed by experimental data, for example, by studying brain tissue necrosis, scientists can find out the biological phenomena occurring at that time, which chemists are involved in this process, which specific chemical compounds are involved, and on the basis of these data, for example, to develop a drug for premature dementia in the elderly and people with disabilities, or at least significantly slow down the flow of these processes, , what “is the breakdown of nucleotide protein compounds, accompanied by necrosis of brain tissues….(in general, you can talk about this for a long time and in the languages of different sciences in different ways, and if you describe everything in a comprehensive way and in all the details, as you can now say intersexially, then you will have to write a whole book at all, but the essence will remain the same, and as the person under the nickname “tanya x” quite correctly noted, subjectively directly “internally” what death really is, subjectively for you, as a subject of perception, neither one nor the other will be able to answer, because while science cannot yet conduct such an experiment, kill a person, and then resurrect and ask: “well, how is it” (and then it will also not be quite death), and it is unlikely that such an experiment will ever be possible to carry out, and while everything that is outside the verified experience, praxis, experiment with the possibility of its repetition with the same result, all this is not science, and, but this will not be a scientific statement and has nothing to do with science)”), but the question “where will consciousness go”, will consciousness move, as a result, as a whole, the interaction of all your body parts, and each part of your body up to the atomic level remains unresolved, or rather this question sends us to an even more complex and comprehensive question what is it, what do we mean by this word “consciousness”, and before it we will have to answer the equally complex question, what do we really mean by this and in what contexts? And here we are truly faced with an abyss of the unknown, because the answer to each of these questions has been dealt with by different scientific disciplines for more than one century. )
….. Or how can we imagine “nothing”, the absence of something can be imagined only in comparison with something else that we previously knew about, the absence of everything, “global nothing”, absolute non-existence can be imagined only by juxtaposing with “everything”, thereby assuming that it would actually be absurd, that we have a priori and complete, available, all the knowledge of this world, that it would be absurd to assert…�.
…. science can already describe this process in full detail, but it will only be a study from an external observer and only the processes of approaching death… . But not a single atom of your body will disappear without a trace, every chemical substance of which your body was composed will only break up into more elementary chemical elements with the release of energy. It gets into the food of other living beings (every part of your body is integrated into the metabolism of the reproductive cycle of other organisms) or goes away, mixing with the wind and the earth deep underground, “dissolving” in the surrounding reality, breaking up into more and more component parts, until it is at the level of atoms and molecules or reaching the subatomic level, “blows” a stream of neutrinos, or less “transparent” particles, What will eventually happen to your consciousness? What will it break up into ? Will it collapse to its “original state”? And does it exist? What did you feel, how did you perceive this world, for example, in a year ? Not to mention the earlier period….. I think it's unlikely, and very few people can boast of it. In any case, will it be “eternal darkness”, “deep coma”, or will the dying body wrap you in a ” time loop “(releasing dimethyltryptamine in your brain (https://nplus1.ru/news/2016/09/20/dmthypoxia (and then it will probably only apply to a quiet death from old age or from suffocation, or from drowning))) and the dying brain will turn the last moment into eternity for you…… (which can also just be a temporary hallucination followed by “emptiness of eternal nothingness”, or in reverse order, but with the same result…). No one knows for sure and I think it's fine.