Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
Everyone has different reasons. Some people delete the page because they think it will help them “focus on work and other more important things”(a stupid excuse for those who can't control themselves), others for show, so that they will pay attention to them. Well, all sorts of “depressions” when you don't want to see or hear anyone.
They don't see any benefit from the cost of keeping it active (“I write, but I don't have any real friends”). And they remove it to reduce the temptation to continue investing in it by inertia. Roughly speaking, you are tired of your habit and want to redirect your energy to something else.
If you do not mention the reasons already mentioned, such as” vk interferes with my work “and” attract attention”, you can find a couple of more or less weighty reasons. First, VK kills live communication. I have repeatedly observed the picture in public places (such as restaurants or cinemas), when a couple was sitting at a table and instead of live communication flipped through the feed on tablets. That is, people have lost the habit of communicating live, and even when they have a choice between real communication and a social network (which was created for long-distance communication), many choose the latter. Secondly, the uselessness of information in the VK. Today, it is quite difficult to find really important information on the Internet in general, let alone on social networks. social networks: given the fact that the vast majority of users are people under the age of 25 (approximately), the information space is also focused on meeting their main needs. Therefore, vk is dominated by public posts with primitive “degrading” information, which is absolutely useless and only clogs the space of a conscious person who is interested in development and prefers to spend his time more productively. Third, a minute-by-minute update of information. Unfortunately, vk is not a newspaper, and it is not enough to open it once a day to catch the main essence of what is happening and interesting things for a person, so that such a need does not arise at least for 24 hours. To keep up with trends in the VK, you need to constantly update and check it, which is why it can take up to 3-4 hours to view one news feed per day in total. This is a huge waste of time that could have been devoted to something more important, such as reading, or studying, even if you would have missed one meme.