Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
I don't know what it's about. If there is any source for this statement , you can throw it off, then you will be able to get acquainted in more detail and understand what it is about.
And in this formulation – some kind of absurdity. Truth, if defined as the objective validity and rightness of any position, does not lose its attributes, no matter how you kick it. From the fact that you were forced to know about “Water is H2O” – the very fact that the water molecule consists of hydrogen and oxygen, does not suffer.
However, in this case, you can assume that this is not true (not true). But what does it matter to the truth? It is also objective, not subjective, correctness, i.e. it does not depend on your attitude to it.
Everything is simple, truth is being, or simply: truth is. And obsession is a manifestation of appearance, illusion, anti-existence. And this is only one side of the question.�
Another is that, as a rule, some particular “truths” are imposed, which have little relation to the Truth, at best, as its aspects.
You can talk about this topic for a very long time, especially if you consider how many hidden meanings are embedded in your question, but perhaps the answer is enough.
because obsession is not part of the properties of Truth, obsession is a property of falsehood. Truth cannot and does not want to be imposed, it wants voluntary and heartfelt acceptance .
You can go even further. The stated truth is not the truth. Words are limiters. That's their nature. Words are like pictures. The nature of photography is to create a small illusion (a limited piece of truth) that looks like a large whole truth. You look at your picture and think, ” This is me.” Do you have any emotions about this? What you're really looking at is a bunch of molecules that have nothing to do with you. For a photograph to convey any truth, the mind that perceives the photograph must be ready to receive that truth. For example, he was able to find similarities between his real appearance and the image. That is, a person must first remember what the truth is, and then discover the similarity of this illusion with the truth. Similarly, the nature of words is to preserve the imprint of truth in the form of text. If the mind of the person who hears or reads the words did not have an understanding of the truth before he began to perceive the words, then these words will not help him in any way to approach the truth. It's like reading a fairy tale to a monkey.
In the Buddhist tradition, it is believed that the human mind by nature has the potential to reveal its freedom. That is, all living beings are unrevealed Buddhas. To reveal your nature, you need to remove the interfering things. These are: hatred, greed, stupidity, attachment to the illusory Self, addiction to harmful things. That is, dharma (wisdom) in the Buddhist sense-these are words that help to reveal, to make actual the truth that is already in every mind in a potentially revealed state. It is as if the child already knew what 2 and 4 are and read that 2+2=4. In the same way, the mind is always aware of its natural freedom, and all words, formulas, practices only help to reveal this knowledge. If the mind is the seed, then words are the earth. A seed can be stored somewhere for years, and then one day it will fall into the ground, and something will grow out of it. (Thus, one day, lotus seeds of more than 1040 years old, successfully preserved in peat, sprang up.)