Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
Read the book Journey of the Soul by Michael Newton. It describes in sufficient detail what happens to the soul after death, describes all the stages. And, of course, answers to the questions that most often arise when you think about this topic
Here a person stubbornly believes that his ancestors are in heaven, but does not think where the soul of the pig or cow that he ate at dinner is. Someone has already said that death is the destruction of everything egoistic, i.e. the Ego. Life after death is, the body is destroyed, giving life to other organisms, and this is life after death. And clinical death is a glitch. The dying dream of the mind. And after that, that's all-the neurons don't run anymore.
The existence of life after death is not scientifically proven, but it is also irrefutable. Irrefutable means that it does not meet the Popper criterion, and science bypasses such things.�
Therefore, it is a matter of your faith, a personal choice that will help you feel most comfortable in the current life.
If it is easier for you to survive the heartache of parting with your deceased loved ones, believing that you will meet again; it is easier to cope with the anxiety caused by the fear of death and the fear of “living life incorrectly”, thinking that death is just the beginning; it is inspiring to think that every thing you do, every decision you make is significant for the Universe, will be taken into account and one day someone big will pat you on the head for the good and punish you for the bad – believe in life after death, do not force yourself to give up this idea. The main thing is that religion does not lead you to intolerance, discrimination, violence, and does not restrict the ability of your spouses and children to manage their lives.
If it is more important for you to feel like a rational person, independently forging life and happiness here and now, squeezing everything possible out of several decades of a unique and unique life; if it is more important for you to feel that the whole world is potentially knowable by a person, can be described by mathematical methods and there is no place for the incomprehensible in it; if it is easier for you to survive your imperfections and weaknesses, knowing that you are only an insignificant grain of sand in the Universe – choose to believe that after death there is only emptiness. The main thing is that this faith does not prevent you from remembering humanity, the value of human life, and you do not devalue other people's opinions, decisions, and lifestyle with its help.
First you need to find out if there is a death. ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING that science says about it is an observation from the outside. On the contrary, there are many testimonies of people who were in a state of clinical death. At least, in a state of clinical death. But science does not want to study their evidence, although it is its direct responsibility to do so. And those few scientists who undertake to do this are ridiculed by their own colleagues.
In the words of science, it is not the absence of a phenomenon that needs to be proved, but its existence. So prove the existence of death! Moving along the causal chain. Prove the termination of all processes. Not only cardiac arrest, but also the cessation of neuronal activity. And after that, the activity of the atoms that make up neurons stops. Follow the entire chain. Prove that the atoms of what used to be the human body no longer interact with each other!
This is already an unsolvable problem for modern science. There are no tools to solve this problem.
there is of course, otherwise human life is simply absurd and meaningless-all these …living in your deeds and other blah-blah-blah is an attempt to “romanticize” emptiness.
A person has a soul-as an entity different from his body. This soul in this body lives in the existing world, accumulates experience, learns and makes its final conclusion about what to join and what to choose. Then it comes out of its capsule (body) at the moment of death and goes to the place assigned to it by the Creator in accordance with its state. Then, at the end of all time, all souls that have ever lived are judged, and as a result of this judgment, souls receive new, incorruptible bodies and live forever in the light of the face of God and His government. It's like paradise lost. Well, for especially dangerous and incorrigible recedivists, there will be a slightly different place – hell. In short, this idea of the Bible is more plausible and meaningful. Here are some more arguments about this :
proza.ru
The mind cannot exist outside the body, no matter what anyone says. Illnesses and ailments, such as lack of sleep and overwork, cloud and blunt the thought process. The gray substance only works when the rest of the body is in order. Even hunger makes it hard to think straight. But energy, as we know, does not die, but passes from one state to another. So this very energy will not die, but will become a part of existence; only in what form – it is not completely clear. This clot or charge will remain and, as I like to think, will become part of some general flow in the universe. That's what our physics teacher told us, and I like the idea.