Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
No, it can't. You can't go down the road and notice that doing something is bad/good.�
Norm, morality are taken from tradition. Symbol. Symbol. Symbol.
I would like to clarify one very important point here. In the concept of morality or morals, the factor of objectivity is fundamentally important. That is, you can easily figure out what kind of behavior a person will benefit from in relation to another person or even the whole society at a particular time. And science may well deal with this within the framework of its methods of cognition.�
But as soon as it comes to defining certain actions of a person as correct, not regardless of someone or something, but objectively, then, as I understand it, science cannot say anything here, simply because it does not think in terms of good and evil, right and wrong, justice and injustice.