Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
First, let's understand the terms, your starting points, and what exactly you want to ask.
First, the wording of the question suggests that you are proceeding from the premise of a certain “ideal state” in the development of Europe. That is, we have a clear development goal, from the ratio with which we can distinguish recessions, peaks, and rises. And there is something that can throw you off this course and lead to sunset. �Then, let me rephrase your question: will something that has appeared now lead to a deviation from this ideal state, and at the same time for the second time?
Secondly, it is not entirely clear what you mean by “modern European humanism”. European humanism is a philosophical trend and system of values that developed during the Renaissance. There was a whole set of descriptions of what the world is, what place a person occupies in it, criteria for a “real” person, and methods of cognition (see the Wikipedia article). Now humanism is used more as an idea of the world (a life position), which is based on the recognition of the value of any person, his rights, freedoms, and personal development. This is more of an individual and/or philosophical position.�
Now directly about the Sunset of Europe. In general, this is about the situation after the First World War and it is just about the collapse of the ideals of classical European humanism. And the sunset was that Europe would fall under the onslaught of new peoples and invaders. �
Based on the structure of your question and the picture attached to it, I think you are referring to the social and political system that has developed since WW II: organizations for ensuring rights and freedoms, tolerance, multiculturalism (although this applies more to Canada).�
Europe really changed after the Second World War, but in connection with the genocide, the Holocaust, the destruction of the colonial system, the change of political regimes, the Cold War. That is, in Spengler's understanding of the decline of Europe, it seems that there was no such thing, although critical changes obviously occurred.
In your question, do you mean: will the post-World War II order change due to the current refugee situation?�
If so, I would say that this order (although “order” is too general a term) began to change in the 60s-70s (and continued in the 90s and zero) due to completely different processes. This is being addressed from different angles (globalization, informatization, changes in capital flows, labor flows, migration).Castells�, Bauman,and many others. If you are talking about more specific and up-to-date processes, you can see, for example,� Van Apeldoorn et al.�It is still necessary to analyze what changes the increased migration of the last year will bring.