Why do atheists mislead the natural sciences?
Eg:Atheist scientists have determined the speed of light and applied it in all sorts of formulas, which has largely led to a dead end. I have my own idea.What if this speed of light emitted by our star is not accidental, and what if this speed of light can be called the speed of light of life?It was this speed that determined the goldilocks zone of our planet, not Mars and Venus. It is at this rate that the chemical and physical processes of life are possible. And if scientists were based on these data, they would learn to calculate the speed of light of other stars. And then, having found similar to our star, emitted the same speed of light, we could simply assume that there is also life there, as on our planet.I'm not being clever, I just want to understand and convey to others the opinion on the question:"Are we lost in science, divided into all sorts of sides, faiths and atheism, or do we need to somehow generalize the sides for the development of science?"
It looks like you're being clever. What makes you think that it was atheist scientists who came up with the SRT, and religious scientists were against it or something? Scientists don't really care who believes what. If you wanted to find out, you would study the question of experimental verification of SRT, for example.
Many scientists lack a critical approach. Measured something on the “table”, at a given time. And then they build a hypothesis, extending it over millions of years and billions of kilometers.
What kind of atheists are they? They believe in no one knows what, the main temple of their faith is the Academy of Sciences, where they honor and do not question the writings of “holy” academicians and luminaries.
There is even its own “inquisition” – a department for combating “pseudoscience”. And for “falsifying” Historical science, you can get a real term, it is even prohibited by the constitution.
“This cannot be, because it can never be” is their main principle of Apologetics. If you have come up with something new, then now justify it by referring to the” holy fathers ” of science. If you can't, it's heresy.
“Dark Middle Ages” in a modern format.
With respect.