Why do atheists mislead the natural sciences?
Eg:Atheist scientists have determined the speed of light and applied it in all sorts of formulas, which has largely led to a dead end. I have my own idea.What if this speed of light emitted by our star is not accidental, and what if this speed of light can be called the speed of light of life?It was this speed that determined the goldilocks zone of our planet, not Mars and Venus. It is at this rate that the chemical and physical processes of life are possible. And if scientists were based on these data, they would learn to calculate the speed of light of other stars. And then, having found similar to our star, emitted the same speed of light, we could simply assume that there is also life there, as on our planet.I'm not being clever, I just want to understand and convey to others the opinion on the question:"Are we lost in science, divided into all sorts of sides, faiths and atheism, or do we need to somehow generalize the sides for the development of science?"