6 Answers
Leave a Reply
You must Register - Login to add an answer.
Login – Register
Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
So everything in the world is an appearance and Maya. For example, you call yourself an “expert on schizophrenia”, and this is clearly nonsense, since you are not worth a penny as an expert on this disease and have only an idea of it as a cool funny-sounding word. Now, do I have to ask you about the differences between schizoaffective disorder and schizophrenia? What's the point?
There is a strong contradiction in the question.
The last sentence ,” You're wrong! “is the verdict of a person with power or intelligence who knows”how it really is.”
That is, the author devalues other people's knowledge and experience “You don't know anything” and from the height of his experience asserts that “I know everything about you, even if I've never seen you.”
Here it is worth digging, where did this problem come from, from whom is it inherited?
Perhaps my mother from childhood devalued in this way all attempts to appear smart and smarter than others?
For the best purposes, with the intention of lowering from heaven to earth. And this character of mom, it seems, turned out to be contagious. ((
Tell me where I went wrong?
Socrates and Democritus. Similar phrases appeared, probably from the understanding that a person is not given to know the truth, but rather the essence of the surrounding and distant or parallel world. All partial, again – only partial understandings of people accumulate in the infosphere. Where does the collected information go-back to some person? So there are new and unexpected discoveries. Mendeleev in a dream – we still fill in the empty cells in his, like him, table. Or to the Chief Curator? I don't know why he should do that. He seems to have all the information in the universes. But, as Antoine de Saint-Exepuri wrote , IF THE STARS ARE LIT, THEN SOMEONE NEEDS IT.
Question: at least someone claims to be true, we speak within the framework of our truth, and it is relevant at the time of writing the answer. I agree that it is impossible to know the truth (at least within my understanding), but you can talk about something within the framework of your truth, but comparing different points of view can give a positive result, although it may be far from the truth.
If the word claim is translated as заявля “to claim one's right to something”, then I claim to be true, because I assume that every consciousness has the right to know the truth. I assume that the truth frees you from problems, and ignorance of the truth increases the number of problems and suffering. My assumptions are supported by experience, I see that the closer the perception of the world is to reality, the less problems there are and vice versa. In addition, I assume that every consciousness is naturally capable of perceiving the truth, but for this purpose, assumptions must be replaced by the experience of realizing the truth.
Caution! Container of mental garbage TID#27. Schizoradioactive!
Extraordinary stuffing of pseudo-philosophical garbage as a result: 1. Relapse of cognitive insanity of the author of the question, 2. Strange connivance of the site administration, which excuses both the anonymity of the character, and the manic repetition of his questions/answers, and his repeated violation of the rules of behavior on thequest Version site.