If you didn't have a bike when you were a kid and now you have a Bentley, you still didn't have a bike when you were a kid.How did this affect his life?
5 Answers
-
Moreover, if there was a bicycle in childhood, then now there might not be a bentley, because all that a person has now is the sum of his life experience. Therefore, it is foolish to grieve unnecessarily for the hardships of the past, if they led you to what you have now. Consciousness is also built up of privations and acquisitions. Thinking about the unhappy past without drawing conclusions is like dragging an unnecessary weight behind you. It is useful to think first of all about how to influence the present so that in the future it will eventually be possible to achieve the goal.
-
It's a proverb that childhood injuries don't get forgotten over time. Road spoon to dinner. The lack of something at one time of life can not be covered by an excess at another. Just like a plant – if it is not watered at the very beginning, it will grow frail, and subsequent care will not help much.
-
When there is something in the kindergarten.. A person gets used to this mechanism, usually as a norm.. And having matured, there are no compelks on this topic and an excessive need to purchase it.. He uses things as convenient and useful items .. And not as something that proves to itself and others its znanchimost being established at the expense of hoarding
-
Such that a person was hurt by this, there is a child's injury, I had to compensate for this lack of a bicycle during my life. It became successful, but there was still some dissatisfaction. It was correctly answered here that a spoon is good for dinner. I found a lot of such “bicycles” in my life, when they were no longer particularly needed. All the same, I still remember those feelings when I needed these” bicycles ” so much, but I didn't have them.
-
Without disputing the distinguished colleagues who offered their answers, I will add grano salis to the question of Pyotr Popov, which is symptomatically related to the topic “Logic”.
Whose (“his”) life will be affected by “your” bike (in the absence mode) and Bentley (in the presence mode)? I foresee a confused and apologetic “Well, this is a typo, because it's already clear who the question is about. Why are you picking on small things?”..
In my childhood, there was a bicycle (and I don't have a Bentley and I don't plan to :), but even more importantly, there were books in it, for example, English poems for children translated by S. Marshak. Here is one of these poems:
There was no nail – the horseshoe was gone.
There was no shoe – the horse was limping.
The horse has gone lame, ” the commander has been killed.
The cavalry is defeated, the Army flees.
The enemy enters the city, sparing no prisoners, –
Because there was no nail in the forge!
.. This is not a small thing: a serious and sincere question to put in a raw hasty form! 🙂
Sincerely and best wishes Andrey Moskvitin
Moreover, if there was a bicycle in childhood, then now there might not be a bentley, because all that a person has now is the sum of his life experience. Therefore, it is foolish to grieve unnecessarily for the hardships of the past, if they led you to what you have now. Consciousness is also built up of privations and acquisitions. Thinking about the unhappy past without drawing conclusions is like dragging an unnecessary weight behind you. It is useful to think first of all about how to influence the present so that in the future it will eventually be possible to achieve the goal.
It's a proverb that childhood injuries don't get forgotten over time. Road spoon to dinner. The lack of something at one time of life can not be covered by an excess at another. Just like a plant – if it is not watered at the very beginning, it will grow frail, and subsequent care will not help much.
When there is something in the kindergarten.. A person gets used to this mechanism, usually as a norm.. And having matured, there are no compelks on this topic and an excessive need to purchase it.. He uses things as convenient and useful items .. And not as something that proves to itself and others its znanchimost being established at the expense of hoarding
Such that a person was hurt by this, there is a child's injury, I had to compensate for this lack of a bicycle during my life. It became successful, but there was still some dissatisfaction. It was correctly answered here that a spoon is good for dinner. I found a lot of such “bicycles” in my life, when they were no longer particularly needed. All the same, I still remember those feelings when I needed these” bicycles ” so much, but I didn't have them.
Without disputing the distinguished colleagues who offered their answers, I will add grano salis to the question of Pyotr Popov, which is symptomatically related to the topic “Logic”.
Whose (“his”) life will be affected by “your” bike (in the absence mode) and Bentley (in the presence mode)? I foresee a confused and apologetic “Well, this is a typo, because it's already clear who the question is about. Why are you picking on small things?”..
In my childhood, there was a bicycle (and I don't have a Bentley and I don't plan to :), but even more importantly, there were books in it, for example, English poems for children translated by S. Marshak. Here is one of these poems:
There was no nail – the horseshoe was gone.
There was no shoe – the horse was limping.
The horse has gone lame, ” the commander has been killed.
The cavalry is defeated, the Army flees.
The enemy enters the city, sparing no prisoners, –
Because there was no nail in the forge!
.. This is not a small thing: a serious and sincere question to put in a raw hasty form! 🙂
Sincerely and best wishes Andrey Moskvitin