Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
The electrochemical process of the brain is the subconscious, consciousness is the inner voice, i.e. a direct connection between the speech and hearing apparatus, bypassing the generation of sounds, the internal dialogue of a person with himself sometimes he can switch to the sound channel, then it seems that a person is talking to someone, but he still talks to himself, only out loud.
There is no other consciousness, the rest is just wakefulness and contemplation, but as soon as a person asks himself a question or simply begins to name: objects, actions, phenomena – here consciousness begins.
Remember the movie “Precinct”, where the dog talks to himself and we hear it – this is the imitation of consciousness on the screen. Or “White Sun of the Desert”, where the main character writes a letter to his wife – we also “hear” his consciousness.
What happens in the brain is also an electrochemical process, but unlike the subconscious, it is a carrier of direct effects on the human hearing aid, which does not happen when just the subconscious mind works.
Is a book a paper with ink applied to it? No! A book becomes a book when ink is organized into words, words are organized into messages, and from these messages someone can extract information. The same book can take an electronic form, and then paper and ink are not needed at all.
Consciousness, like the psyche in general, is also not an electrochemical process, but an informational process, and the brain with its biological and electrochemical processes is just a tool, a carrier.
No, it will not become obsolete, but it will be supplemented with the line “this is also the electrochemical process of the brain”, suggesting that neurons can conduct many different energies in the brain.
Of course it will!
It will be called Na (+) UpK (+)DownRebootOnlineNet (Napcadownrebutonlinnet). The prediction is based on knowledge of the process of pulse formation, the interaction of neurons, and the English language.
In Russian, this name can be translated as depolarization-recharge in the web.
It is not outdated, but incorrect and does not explain anything. Neither today, nor ever before, would any scientist define consciousness in this way. The definition must be unambiguous. What is the “electrochemical process of the brain”? One impulse, its spread, thought, emotion, or maybe an epileptic seizure? See, no specifics. And yet you are right in some ways, consciousness is really based on the simplest processes. What ELSE it is and how it is implemented is not yet fully understood. If you present your definition as I said , it won't be obsolete, because it can't be that way. It's like saying ” an organism is a group of cells.” And try to prove the opposite. Only these are just the first three words out of a thousand in the definition of an organism. What will happen in 2100 is unknown to anyone.
It seems to me that against the background of brain research and experiments related to this area (in particular, I am talking about recognizing letters and symbols when analyzing human brain activity), we will find even more facts indicating the material nature of our consciousness. At the moment, we do not have a single proof in favor of the “ideal” nature of human consciousness and consciousness in principle.