
Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
The only moral value that can unite society in Russia, not only its secular part, but also its religious part, consisting of representatives of different faiths, is to preserve the territory on which our peoples live and sovereignty, so that we can be masters on our own land. And this is the primary and highest value for each person, on which all other values depend. Every nation and every person has their own values that are different from others, but this primary one is common to all those who connect the future of their children with Russia.
The answer is both very simple and extremely complex. The greatest moral value that could unite a world society is CONSCIENCE, in contrast to the subjective and mostly abstract category of justice, conscience is an integral personal component of the consciousness of each member of society.It is not for nothing that “unscrupulous” people are qualified in society as “moral freaks”. When I talk about conscience, I mean the general humanitarian aspect of this phenomenon, not the narrowly confessional one.
I think it's wrong to put a single value at the top of everything. It is impossible to combine all of them under a single value. If you look at any serious social teaching, from religion to neo-positivism and Marxism, you will see a certain set of values, a set of dogmas that are interconnected with each other.
And this is natural and normal. Society does not live by its economy, or culture, or laws alone. Society includes the economy, culture, laws, demography, and dozens of other areas. And it is possible to fully unite society only by defining the values in each area and linking them together in a complete, consistent picture.
I think it's wrong to put a single value at the top of everything. It is impossible to combine all of them under a single value. If you look at any serious social teaching, from religion to neo-positivism and Marxism, you will see a certain set of values, a set of dogmas that are interconnected with each other.
And this is natural and normal. Society does not live by its economy, or culture, or laws alone. Society includes the economy, culture, laws, demography, and dozens of other areas. And it is possible to fully unite society only by defining the values in each area and linking them together in a complete, consistent picture.
Alexander Dugin has been trying for many years to promote the concept of the primitive unconscious for a new formation of morality.
This is expressed in his fourth ideological theory. Special attention is paid to three almost obsolete models. Which have long been overgrown with postmodern moss and have not been ridiculed except by the lazy.
The very essence of the implementation is described in a small fragment of the video in a very simple presentation: youtu.be/s0YPSw8xTc8
Something like the Burning Man Festival, which is an annual event held in the Black Rock Desert in Nevada
None at all. Postmodern society does not and cannot have morality, especially when the absolute majority of the elite and even part of the intelligentsia constantly worship the cult of money, power and violence. The only” values ” then are the values of the criminal world – and look, they get into the minds of young people in the form of all sorts of three-letter movements that are prohibited on the territory of the Russian Federation (I don't want to voice the abbreviation, otherwise I can sit down) and so on. Society can only unite a common national project, a common cause that will be understood by everyone.