Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
From the cognitive point of view, it is definitely cats that, using the set of semantic units and constructions that they have, can adequately communicate their needs and adequately understand/respond to what they are told (although not immediately and often through “face in a puddle”). With theomism (theomist), everything is much sadder – neither rational learning nor negative training has yet given a stable positive result.
From the point of view of sanitation-again seals. One tray is enough for each well-bred cat. The only theomist-seeks to pollute the entire network territory available to him.
Summary: the cat walks by itself, the theomist walks by itself.
Let's assume that cats. Assume a theomism. Let's assume that cats and theomism. Theomism encompasses all hypotheses and assumptions, all possible variants, including seals. And not just Schrodinger's cats.